TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Trump Campaign Built an Identity Database and with Facebook Ads Won the Election

16 点作者 eadz超过 8 年前

5 条评论

leepowers超过 8 年前
Just to clarify, the Trump campaign purchased large databases of user info from Experian, Epsilon, and other large data brokers in an attempt to target potential voters for negative ads. You can opt out of these databases, though I don&#x27;t know how effective this is, as there is no requirement in law to offer opt-out:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.stopdatamining.me&#x2F;opt-out-list&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.stopdatamining.me&#x2F;opt-out-list&#x2F;</a><p>On another note: the article doesn&#x27;t discuss any digital initiatives by the Clinton campaign. Given her advantage in fundraising, Clinton undoubtedly had a comparably large digital initiative that campaigned negatively against Trump. Without examining the whole ecosystem it&#x27;s inaccurate to declare that Trump won because of digital. Both campaign&#x27;s efforts may have more or less offset each other.
Mathnerd314超过 8 年前
I find it surprising how Trump&#x27;s opinion on databases changed:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.washingtonpost.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;monkey-cage&#x2F;wp&#x2F;2016&#x2F;05&#x2F;20&#x2F;a-trump-campaign-will-only-increase-the-democrats-advantage-in-data-and-analytics&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.washingtonpost.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;monkey-cage&#x2F;wp&#x2F;2016&#x2F;05&#x2F;2...</a><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.newsmax.com&#x2F;Politics&#x2F;US-GOP-2016-Trump&#x2F;2016&#x2F;05&#x2F;30&#x2F;id&#x2F;731409&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.newsmax.com&#x2F;Politics&#x2F;US-GOP-2016-Trump&#x2F;2016&#x2F;05&#x2F;30...</a><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.politico.com&#x2F;story&#x2F;2016&#x2F;06&#x2F;donald-trump-tech-data-fundraising-224865" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.politico.com&#x2F;story&#x2F;2016&#x2F;06&#x2F;donald-trump-tech-data...</a><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2016-10-27&#x2F;inside-the-trump-bunker-with-12-days-to-go" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2016-10-27&#x2F;inside-the...</a>
kordless超过 8 年前
I quit Facebook in 2010 because of an article that ran in the NY Times. Grateful it&#x27;s given me time to do other things. Grateful it&#x27;s limited Facebook&#x27;s ability to influence my thinking with dissonant communications which unfortunately drives their revenue.
bobsil1超过 8 年前
No causality. Can anyone think of another reason why blacks turned out more for Barack?
mr_blobs超过 8 年前
When Obama (with the help of Eric Schmidt) does it, it&#x27;s &#x27;brilliant&#x27;:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2013-05-30&#x2F;googles-eric-schmidt-invests-in-obamas-big-data-brains" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2013-05-30&#x2F;googles-er...</a><p>When Trump does the exact same thing, we have an article disparaging his win and accusing him of &#x27;voter suppression&#x27;.<p>If this is the new definition of &#x27;voter suppression&#x27;, I think every politician is guilty of it. I just wish we would stop changing the definitions of everything in an attempt to win an argument or sway public opinion. This is the definition of propaganda.<p>Clinton paid people to spam public forums with anti-Trump propaganda, but nobody discusses it or even cares about it. The &#x27;rigged&#x27; system Trump talked about before the election is still in full force.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;theantimedia.org&#x2F;hillary-clintons-internet-troll-army&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;theantimedia.org&#x2F;hillary-clintons-internet-troll-army...</a>