From the article:<p><i>"Two minutes of exposure and your cells will soon begin to hemorrhage;"</i><p>It is sad to see this level of sensationalism in first 3 lines of the article.<p>Not only cells CAN'T hemorrhage by definition (hemorrhage is blood escaping from the circulatory system, cells don't have blood inside them), but that claim is completely made up, not present in the NRC article linked. Any decent level of fact-checking would have caught that.<p>Making up fake definitions for precise medical terms for the sake of impact is really bad journalism.<p>And then it's followed by:<p><i>"During a routine test on April 26, 1986, reactor Number 4 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant experienced a power surge that triggered an emergency shutdown."</i><p><i>"If it hits ground water, it could trigger another catastrophic explosion or leach radioactive material into the water nearby residents drink."</i><p>Which is contradicted by the article itself:<p><i>"Oozing through pipes and eating through concrete, the radioactive lava flow from reactor Number 4 eventually cooled enough to solidfy[sic]."</i>