TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Pet Containers: You’re Not Doing It Wrong

16 点作者 steilpass超过 8 年前

2 条评论

tzaman超过 8 年前
I strongly disagree with this.<p>Pet usually means there&#x27;s a whole lot going on the server (or the container, for that matter), and you need more tools in order to maintain whatever that is. PostgreSQL for example. In order to run it &quot;properly&quot;, you need to manually set up replication, backups, failover scenarios, monitoring, logging, etc,... And most containers are kept simple so they only run one process (or very few of them) - and they often come with very little extra libraries installed, which makes any kind of advanced setup much harder.<p>Pet containers are stateful, and that state is often data. Data that is crucial to your business. I wouldn&#x27;t trust a container to handle it, it&#x27;s just too dumb (by design, I guess?)
vorotato超过 8 年前
yes you are, and so is the author.