TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Bootstrap 4 drops IE9 support and goes full flexbox

381 点作者 luisrudge超过 8 年前

29 条评论

mgkimsal超过 8 年前
For everyone saying &quot;Foundation&quot; when people ask what else... let me explain why Bootstrap is used so much more frequently than all other options combined.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;foundation.zurb.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;foundation.zurb.com</a> vs <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;getbootstrap.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;getbootstrap.com</a><p>Each has a link to &#x27;download&#x27;.<p>Foundation&#x27;s link takes me to a page where I have a bunch of options, and a bit &quot;build a custom generated version&quot;.<p>Bootstrap&#x27;s takes me to a screen with 3 options, but also - and this is key - CDN links. Right there. I can paste a few lines in my HTML template and start working.<p>I don&#x27;t need to download&#x2F;generate code.<p>I don&#x27;t need to install node&#x2F;npm&#x2F;etc.<p>I don&#x27;t need to install and learn sass stuff.<p>I don&#x27;t need to make a lot of decisions or do a lot of extra unrelated stuff to get started.<p>Bootstrap is the PHP of the css&#x2F;grid&#x2F;framework world (for better and for worse).<p>I truly hope they keep the CDN hosted stuff for Bootstrap 4.<p>EDIT: didn&#x27;t mean to pick on foundation specifically - this &quot;take control of every aspect of all your layout&#x2F;grid&#x2F;css&quot; that most other frameworks require works to their disadvantage when it comes to popularity and uptake.
评论 #13232773 未加载
评论 #13233760 未加载
评论 #13232494 未加载
评论 #13232433 未加载
评论 #13232682 未加载
评论 #13232443 未加载
评论 #13236351 未加载
评论 #13233810 未加载
评论 #13232967 未加载
评论 #13233682 未加载
评论 #13236431 未加载
评论 #13234224 未加载
评论 #13236451 未加载
评论 #13234452 未加载
评论 #13234088 未加载
评论 #13232980 未加载
ceejay超过 8 年前
I find it extremely powerful that major open source projects are calling the shots instead of the major browser vendors.<p>For some who may not recall, I think the most famous &#x2F; historic move was when jQuery decided version 2 would deprecate support for IE 6&#x2F;7&#x2F;8.<p>Originally jQuery project would go out of their way to make sure all browsers were covered. Needless to say these days Microsoft is far more receptive to the needs of the open source community.
评论 #13233234 未加载
评论 #13234273 未加载
based2超过 8 年前
&gt; <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;flexboxfroggy.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;flexboxfroggy.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #13232064 未加载
评论 #13232600 未加载
评论 #13231981 未加载
评论 #13232694 未加载
评论 #13233643 未加载
astrodust超过 8 年前
It&#x27;s so great that IE9 is essentially extinct.
评论 #13231971 未加载
评论 #13232450 未加载
评论 #13232407 未加载
dbond超过 8 年前
&quot;Drop IE9 support for v4 beta?&quot; &quot;fuck it, why not&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;twbs&#x2F;bootstrap&#x2F;issues&#x2F;21387" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;twbs&#x2F;bootstrap&#x2F;issues&#x2F;21387</a><p>This isn&#x27;t how you should drop support, it might be a good choice but can we at least have some discussion, maybe even an RFC, not just declare it be so within the space of 3 hours and lock the issue...<p>Like this: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;emberjs&#x2F;rfcs&#x2F;pull&#x2F;45" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;emberjs&#x2F;rfcs&#x2F;pull&#x2F;45</a>
评论 #13232709 未加载
评论 #13233049 未加载
评论 #13232877 未加载
评论 #13234529 未加载
评论 #13232677 未加载
tmoreton超过 8 年前
Finally! Every other major framework needs to jump on this bandwagon and stop supporting IE9 and then the users will realize they are outdated...at least I would hope so. Every aspect of Frontend development adds a ton of extra hours when building around IE9&#x27;s quirks. I had the same idea as Bootstrap building my own Flexbox based CSS framework Useful.ly
cygned超过 8 年前
Ah the worst thing about Bootstrap is jQuery because it&#x27;s a pain to integrate it into Single Page Applications properly. That&#x27;s why I enjoy Bulma (bulma.io) so much - just CSS but still 90% of the stuff you get in Bootstrap.
评论 #13232765 未加载
评论 #13232840 未加载
nateberkopec超过 8 年前
I&#x27;ve replaced Bootstrap with Milligram (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;milligram.github.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;milligram.github.io&#x2F;</a>) on all of my projects.<p>Yes, it weighs far far less (which makes it suitable for inlining directly in the head tag), but mostly I just find the source far more readable.
评论 #13235836 未加载
tribby超过 8 年前
traditionally the reason I&#x27;ve avoided flexbox for layout (fine for most items within that layout) is the wonky rendering on slower connections[0]. is bootstrap doing anything to get around this or did they really go &quot;full flexbox&quot;? since I use susy[1] I&#x27;ll never need bootstrap for grids, but I&#x27;m curious about the flexbox adoption and tradeoffs.<p>0. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=vPryjyFP5FM" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=vPryjyFP5FM</a><p>1. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;susy.oddbird.net&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;susy.oddbird.net&#x2F;</a>
评论 #13234468 未加载
评论 #13233704 未加载
apaprocki超过 8 年前
What are peoples&#x27; opinions whether CSS Grid will replace Flexbox usage in a lot of simple layout cases?
评论 #13232203 未加载
评论 #13232797 未加载
评论 #13236982 未加载
rado超过 8 年前
An unfortunate tipping point for accessibility. My personal project natUIve is full flexbox, supports IE8, doesn&#x27;t require JS even for the slider. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;radogado.github.io&#x2F;natuive&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;radogado.github.io&#x2F;natuive&#x2F;</a>
评论 #13235912 未加载
评论 #13235750 未加载
jgalt212超过 8 年前
I&#x27;m a bit sad for the dropping of IE 9 support, if only because it was the first IE that had a &quot;fast&quot; JS engine and didn&#x27;t take forever to render our JS heavy site.
ourmandave超过 8 年前
Of course there&#x27;s a flexbox JS shim.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;jonathantneal&#x2F;flexibility" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;jonathantneal&#x2F;flexibility</a>
评论 #13232199 未加载
评论 #13233711 未加载
sergiotapia超过 8 年前
That&#x27;s great. I wonder how much traffic will be saved worldwide without .col-md-6 html being sent around. Just straight up content HTML with minimal &quot;boxing&quot;.<p>This is great news!
chiefalchemist超过 8 年前
Slightly off topic but ZURB Foundation for Email is a nice tool for generation markup that&#x27;ll work in most email clients<p>FWIW you don&#x27;t really know a lot of Foundation to use it.
andy_ppp超过 8 年前
I&#x27;d love it if they had a things don&#x27;t look broken promise for IE9. Seems like it should be relatively easy to sequentially layout the page in IE9 without flexbox?<p>Is everyone else dropping IE9 support at this stage...<p>I&#x27;m a bit out of the frontend developer loop these days being full stack and learning things like docker or elixir is more fun, and useful, than the vagaries of the latest promise library&#x2F;CSS Pre processor&#x2F;awful class naming scheme&#x2F;etc.
cwt137超过 8 年前
This is a pull request that hasn&#x27;t been merged yet. Maybe the title should be &quot;Proposal to drop IE9 support and go full flexbox in Bootstrap 4&quot;
评论 #13236733 未加载
ksec超过 8 年前
Since Google, is essentially what everybody in the western world uses to search, ( Russia, China, Japan, Korea all gets their own search from somewhere else. )<p>I wish they could release some stats on browser usage. Otherwise i dont know where to get concrete information without substantial bias. Also the time which browsers are used. Since people are likely using different browsers in School &#x2F; Work compared to at Home.
gtk40超过 8 年前
IE7-IE9 still receive security updates on some versions of Windows. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.microsoft.com&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;gp&#x2F;microsoft-internet-explorer&#x2F;en-us" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.microsoft.com&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;gp&#x2F;microsoft-internet-ex...</a><p>IE9 is the newest version of IE available for Windows Vista SP2 for example.
评论 #13233052 未加载
desireco42超过 8 年前
Right move. We need to push forward.
szastupov超过 8 年前
Migration from 3 to 4 will certainly be a pain but then you&#x27;re gonna love it. I love new cards, utility classes, better out of the box support for mobile browsers.<p>But beware of breaking changes between alphas, there are quite a few.
评论 #13234834 未加载
bluetwo超过 8 年前
My front-end framework is simply HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.<p>Why complicate my life?<p>I do love flexbox, but I would rather simply code it by hand rather than have some tool&#x2F;framework&#x2F;precompiler do it for me.
评论 #13232899 未加载
评论 #13232854 未加载
truth_sentinell超过 8 年前
Was about damn time a major player like this dropped IE, should have been IE10 though. Good move nonetheless.
dexterdog超过 8 年前
I thought you never go full flexbox
buckbova超过 8 年前
Does anyone know when to expect a RC? Looks to be in alpha still.
评论 #13232109 未加载
vayarajesh超过 8 年前
I feel I have gotten too used to Material design and I hardly ever use bootstrap. Do anyone of you feel the same?<p>What are the advantages of Bootstrap over Material Design?
scotchio超过 8 年前
What percentage of users still use IE9?
评论 #13232730 未加载
jeffehobbs超过 8 年前
Excellent choice!
wcarron超过 8 年前
Bootstrap is really so far behind now I don&#x27;t know why anyone even considers it as a viable option anymore. How long have they been in alpha&#x2F;beta stage without a solid RC? It&#x27;s legitimately pathetic and abysmal at this point.<p>I&#x27;m honestly really confused. I&#x27;d love to ask one of the devs how they&#x27;ve managed to literally do nothing while other, better CSS frameworks have been created AND versioned in the same timeframe.<p>Bootstrap 4 is just a sad attempt at preventing obsolescence. Time to let it die.
评论 #13232173 未加载
评论 #13232138 未加载
评论 #13232126 未加载
评论 #13232128 未加载
评论 #13234233 未加载
评论 #13232190 未加载
评论 #13232154 未加载