TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How removing caching improved mobile performance by 25%

116 点作者 thijser超过 8 年前

7 条评论

tyingq超过 8 年前
Well, specifically removing the html5 offline application cache if you don&#x27;t need offline functionality.<p>That it causes duplicate requests, and apparently more of them in chrome mobile than other browsers, is interesting though.
评论 #13368842 未加载
modeless超过 8 年前
&gt; Never use the application cache (or service workers) unless you actually need offline features.<p>I disagree. Appcache is deprecated and you should never use it under any circumstances. On the other hand, service workers are cool and there are reasons to use them even if you don&#x27;t need offline features.
评论 #13370181 未加载
评论 #13371689 未加载
xenadu02超过 8 年前
Since when is only testing in Chrome an acceptable way to develop web applications?<p>I wish the author had shown us some other browser results. I&#x27;m curious if the iframe changes affected Safari, Firefox, or Edge. (Others have noted that app cache is deprecated).
评论 #13380174 未加载
评论 #13371332 未加载
评论 #13370802 未加载
power78超过 8 年前
This article just displays the author&#x27;s lack of knowledge of the subject matter he is developing with. Something tells me it was written just to get the company&#x27;s name out there.
评论 #13371355 未加载
评论 #13373136 未加载
sp332超过 8 年前
Did you know you can use Firefox Developer Tools to remotely debug mobile Chrome? It&#x27;s still in heavy development, but I&#x27;m guessing it&#x27;s easier than trying to quiesce browser activity and tease out network events manually. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developer.mozilla.org&#x2F;en-US&#x2F;docs&#x2F;Tools&#x2F;Valence" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developer.mozilla.org&#x2F;en-US&#x2F;docs&#x2F;Tools&#x2F;Valence</a>
calvin0超过 8 年前
Did this have any improvement on the conversion rate?
thinkloop超过 8 年前
Is this considered a bug in appcache (deprecation aside)? Why would it download twice at all?
评论 #13372595 未加载