Anand retains world chess championship title

There's some excellent commentary on YouTube, especially from ChessNetwork [ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/ChessNetwork#p/c/825C29F1B294C194" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/user/ChessNetwork#p/c/825C29F1B294C19...</a>] and jrobichess [ <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/jrobichess#p/c/31E306A93108AFBE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/user/jrobichess#p/c/31E306A93108AFBE</a> ]. jrobichess is yet to release commentary for game 12 thought.<p>Overall some really good games, I thought Topalov was going to win, but he sure made a blunder in game 12 - - maybe he was under too much pressure.

It's hard to belive that Topalov played 31... exf5 and 31...fxe4 it seemed extremely dangerous to free the powerful bishop in a8.

GM Giri on on chessbase has had excellent analysis of the whole match, here's his writeup of game 12:<p><a href="http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=6327" rel="nofollow">http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=6327</a>

So, what is a good book on chess strategies mentioned in the article?

Ny nephew is ranked at 2200 ELO points, which makes me automatically love chess. Myself, I'm not so good (-:

There's nothing special or interesting in this article except for people who already play chess at a very high level. Heck, I wonder how many Hacker News readers could tell the difference between this game and a game between the two best players in Rhode Island (no offense to Rhode Island.) And the Hacker News readers who can learn from this article already know where to find coverage, so why post it on HN?