TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Adobe angers Chrome users by bundling browser plugin with security update

224 点作者 ckrailo超过 8 年前

13 条评论

Falkon1313超过 8 年前
&gt; The plugin seeks permission to do three things; &quot;read and change all data on the websites you visit,&quot; &quot;manage your downloads,&quot; and &quot;communicate with cooperating native applications.&quot; [...]<p>&gt; it&#x27;s likely that the extension itself is harmless enough<p>That seems unlikely given Adobe&#x27;s history of truly awful security flaws. It wasn&#x27;t that long ago when they thought that it would be a good idea for their add-on to pre-render PDFs in RAM silently in the background, including executing any embedded code without any sandboxing. Combined with browsers&#x27; prefetching of urls in a page (so that it would load quicker in case you clicked it), this caused a number of rootkit and other malware infections - from links that people didn&#x27;t even click in search results and URLs served up in advertising or in comments&#x2F;forum posts.<p>The only permission needed by a PDF viewer should be &#x27;display PDF document content&#x27;. It shouldn&#x27;t need to read or change other data, manage downloads, or communicate with anything to display an e-book or document. If it does, it&#x27;s probably not harmless.
评论 #13388300 未加载
Esau超过 8 年前
&quot;The extension also collects basic information and sends this to Adobe. This tracking appears to be on by default, though it can be disabled through the extension&#x27;s options page.&quot;<p>Another company collecting telemetry that you have to opt-out of. This needs to be illegal because often, by the time most people learn of the option, their information has already been snarfed.
评论 #13390069 未加载
kylec超过 8 年前
At this point, browsers should block all plugins not explicitly installed through the browser. I can&#x27;t think of any circumstances in which I would be happy to find that some software I installed has automatically installed a browser plugin.
评论 #13387714 未加载
评论 #13389075 未加载
natch超过 8 年前
Meanwhile, in the same ethical bucket, Oracle as recently as a week ago is adding a Yahoo! toolbar to your browser when you update Java, unless you uncheck their pre-checked opt-in checkbox. Sigh.
评论 #13388129 未加载
评论 #13388959 未加载
评论 #13389197 未加载
caconym_超过 8 年前
My mom was a bit upset when I told her she couldn&#x27;t install Adobe or Oracle software on her new computer (iMac) a few years ago, but today the thing still runs like it just came out of the box.<p>Do the right thing, and tell your family and friends to stay away from this malware.
评论 #13389633 未加载
jamesgaston超过 8 年前
I have a vague recollection of an incident, years ago, whereby Adobe installed Macafee whenever you installed a flash update. There was a little checkbox to control this, but it was checked by default. Pissed me off, i had get macafee off my computer pronto as it didn&#x27;t get along with the anti virus i had already installed.
评论 #13388302 未加载
评论 #13389656 未加载
评论 #13388813 未加载
Traubenfuchs超过 8 年前
I really wonder how it feels to create user-hostile software like that that is borderline malicious and barely adds any value.
评论 #13390801 未加载
huffmsa超过 8 年前
My current beef with Adobe is that they took a perfectly good mobile version of Photoshop for Android, broke it into 5 separate applications, that when combined, don&#x27;t even reach the full functionality of the application they are replacing.<p>Oh and they&#x27;re each the size of the original app.<p>Who signs off on this?
评论 #13391212 未加载
bostand超过 8 年前
Isn&#x27;t this against the chrome ToS?<p>Can Google retaliate by removing their extension from the store?
评论 #13390587 未加载
peteretep超过 8 年前
Someone really really needs to fix browser plugin permission system so that control can be very very fine-grained, and it&#x27;s easy to review what information has been passed back and forth.
评论 #13389756 未加载
robin_reala超过 8 年前
Given that Chrome itself was often bundled with Adobe Flash and Reader security updates I’m not sure they’ve got much of a case.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;forums.adobe.com&#x2F;thread&#x2F;1053973" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;forums.adobe.com&#x2F;thread&#x2F;1053973</a>
jimjimjim超过 8 年前
Jeeze adobe, try digging up.
ksk超过 8 年前
Well, do the users know that Chrome itself sends a bunch of data to Google? On principle, I consider both Adobe and Google&#x27;s practices to be abhorrent, but practically speaking Google definitely has the better record on product reliability and security.