TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Disillusioned in Davos

35 点作者 jackgavigan超过 8 年前

5 条评论

ktRolster超过 8 年前
<i>I am disturbed by (i) the spectacle of financiers who three months ago were telling anyone who would listen that they would never do business with a Trump company rushing to praise the new Administration</i><p>He is surprised that bankers are in a hurry to put themselves in a position to make money?
评论 #13449175 未加载
评论 #13450315 未加载
MrQuincle超过 8 年前
I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s the job of foreign leaders to tell the American people that they elected an individual with certain character traits or history. There are many foreign leaders who are not as nice, benign as we would hope they would be.<p>The extreme action would be an intervention. This will only be done if 90% of the US population is suffering and asking for help. Even if there would be camps where people would be murdered, the world will not interfere.<p>An isolationist policy very likely allows the rest of the world to refocus. By making the US less dependent on the world, the world will become less dependent on the US. The ties between Europe and Asia will become stronger and I&#x27;m curious what that will bring.
评论 #13449432 未加载
gorbachev超过 8 年前
&quot;the unwillingness of business leaders who rightly take pride in their corporate efforts to promote women and minorities to say anything about Presidentially sanctioned intolerance&quot;<p>Remember this when Silicon Valley leaders lick his boots.
leereeves超过 8 年前
&gt; Businesses who get on the wrong side of the new President have lost billions of dollars of value in sixty seconds because of a tweet.<p>#fakenews?<p>The story linked from that remark is about the cost of the F-35, with no mention of a personal vendetta (&quot;getting on the wrong side of the new President&quot;).
drinkjuice超过 8 年前
&gt; It is a lesson of human experience whether the issue is playground bullying, Enron or Europe in the 1930s that the worst outcomes occur when good people find reasons to accommodate themselves to what they know is wrong.<p>Hannah Arendt mentioned something like this in an interview, how many of the intellectual friends (or maybe rather acquaintances; intellectuals, anyway) she had had in Germany were very apt at coming up with all sorts of &quot;high minded&quot; things about Hitler. You know, cutesy salon talk, theories, predictions. She found this grotesque, obviously.<p>I am often reminded of this when reading HN. And frankly, I find this circus about Trump mostly circus. I mean, what is the difference between him and other presidents or people who ran? That he is <i>openly</i> gross? That he doesn&#x27;t sugar coat me-first fascism? That he makes the underbelly visible? You know what&#x27;s worse than talking shit about women or foreigners? Killing them in the thousands and millions. But oh boy, just nobody say &quot;pussy&quot;, nobody be a racist, and of course, nobody call anyone a Nazi or something. America, the country where it&#x27;s leadership this and excellence that, with glorification of the military as bookends. Where people excuse pushing for putting the whole of humanity into a little glass bottle and smashing it on a rock with the fact that this or that isn&#x27;t unleashed on Americans, or not on Americans yet, or to lesser degree, yet.<p>This becomes even more obvious when some people do what they consider making a moral point. Like that Streep Oscar acceptance speech. All that compassionate work Hollywood is doing, awww. Are those baby shoes, or is that really the best you&#x27;ve got?<p>Even the post by Summers essentially boils down to:<p>&gt; It is to enabling if not encouraging immoral and reckless policies in other spheres that ultimately bear on our prosperity.<p>If that is your main concern, I&#x27;m not impressed. If your problem is that you <i>might</i> get put in a train cart, and not that others have already <i>been</i> put in one and tortured to death at their destination, while their murderers still show off the gold they extracted from their teeth at gala dinners, you are not measurably better, not compared to others. You&#x27;re the front organization, compared to which the more radical inner circle can consider itself more hardcore, you&#x27;re the fake representation of an outer world, to steal another thought from Arendt which I do think applies.<p>And it&#x27;s a bit like using terrorism or pedophiles to push totalitarianism -- how could anyone criticize that? How could anyone criticize people criticizing Trump for being racist or whatever? Well, they&#x27;re the good cop to the bad cop, made more effective by having no clue that&#x27;s what they are. They mean well, which makes it more important to insist on the point.<p>Good luck I guess.
评论 #13449446 未加载