TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants. (2007)

214 点作者 mishkovski超过 8 年前

15 条评论

problems超过 8 年前
Some of the conclusions seem a little quacky here to me - like &quot;avoid ingredients you can&#x27;t pronounce&quot; and a lot of &quot;avoid processed anything&quot;.<p>While I&#x27;m sure there&#x27;s some arguable benefits to these things, I think it&#x27;s paranoid or stupid to dismiss something just for being &quot;processed&quot;. What the heck does that mean anyway? All our food is processed in one form or another and nothing about something being more processed necessitates any loss.<p>Maybe I just have no sense for quality, but I&#x27;ve tried paying double for &quot;organic&quot; products and similar - only to be repeatedly disappointed with products that taste worse or equal and spoil quicker - I&#x27;ll never buy them again, it just doesn&#x27;t make sense to pay more for it.
评论 #13490428 未加载
评论 #13490904 未加载
评论 #13489884 未加载
评论 #13489526 未加载
评论 #13491635 未加载
评论 #13489334 未加载
评论 #13490548 未加载
评论 #13489344 未加载
评论 #13490181 未加载
评论 #13491268 未加载
评论 #13494167 未加载
ericdykstra超过 8 年前
This is a great article, and should be widely read beyond that piece of succinct eating advice. For example, this is a great paragraph:<p>&gt; In many cases, long familiarity between foods and their eaters leads to elaborate systems of communications up and down the food chain, so that a creature’s senses come to recognize foods as suitable by taste and smell and color, and our bodies learn what to do with these foods after they pass the test of the senses, producing in anticipation the chemicals necessary to break them down. Health depends on knowing how to read these biological signals: this smells spoiled; this looks ripe; that’s one good-looking cow. This is easier to do when a creature has long experience of a food, and much harder when a food has been designed expressly to deceive its senses — with artificial flavors, say, or synthetic sweeteners.<p>In fact, I recently read a book, <i>The Dorito Effect</i> which goes into this in much, much more detail, and I highly recommend it to anyone interested in the subject. I bought it thinking it would be a light read, based on the title and cover, but it was more engaging, better researched, and more informative than I expected.
ENTP超过 8 年前
When I eat carbs, I put on weight. When I don&#x27;t, I lose weight. However, other people I know are the opposite. Quite honestly, I think you can&#x27;t generalise &#x27;diets&#x27; or eating advice as, frankly, it would appear that different people&#x27;s bodies work in slightly different ways. This could explain the vast array of different advice that, often times, seems contradictory.
评论 #13490358 未加载
评论 #13489818 未加载
评论 #13490171 未加载
评论 #13489803 未加载
评论 #13489736 未加载
评论 #13489150 未加载
theparanoid超过 8 年前
Gary Taubes &quot;What if It&#x27;s All Been a Big Fat Lie?&quot; [1] is worth reading. Previously he wrote about bad science.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nytimes.com&#x2F;2002&#x2F;07&#x2F;07&#x2F;magazine&#x2F;what-if-it-s-all-been-a-big-fat-lie.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nytimes.com&#x2F;2002&#x2F;07&#x2F;07&#x2F;magazine&#x2F;what-if-it-s-all-bee...</a>
评论 #13490430 未加载
wyager超过 8 年前
Nutrition, as a field, is mostly quackery and bullshit. There&#x27;s a reason the advice changes drastically every few years, and at any time there are 10 competing fad diets, each apparently supported by some number of reputable scientific authorities.<p>We do not have the predictive power at this time to make authoritative recommendations about what each and every person should eat, except for fairly straightforward things like &quot;eat vitamin C or you will get scurvy&quot;.<p>Check again 50 years or so. Maybe by then you can walk into a medical clinic, get a DNA and gut ecosystem analysis, and walk out with a useful dietary recommendation.
评论 #13488780 未加载
评论 #13488555 未加载
评论 #13488638 未加载
评论 #13489819 未加载
评论 #13488631 未加载
unknown_apostle超过 8 年前
For those interested: Nassim Taleb extends this kind of epistemological conservatism to other complex domains, such as economics, finance, religion and psychology.<p>&quot;You would not have read this far into this article if your food culture were intact and healthy; you would simply eat the way your parents and grandparents and great-grandparents taught you to eat. The question is, Are we better off with these new authorities than we were with the traditional authorities they supplanted? The answer by now should be clear.&quot;
评论 #13502309 未加载
sebleon超过 8 年前
&quot;When William Prout isolated the big three macronutrients, scientists figured they now understood food and what the body needs from it; when the vitamins were isolated a few decades later, scientists thought, O.K., now we really understand food and what the body needs to be healthy; today it’s the polyphenols and carotenoids that seem all-important. But who knows what the hell else is going on deep in the soul of a carrot?&quot;<p>Ha, I&#x27;d love to hear what the soylent folks would say about this passage.
评论 #13489778 未加载
umberway超过 8 年前
Nutrition, medicine, psychology are beset by <i>empiricism</i>: trying to find facts without having theories to support them. Journalists then make hay with the results, hinting at conclusions and advice for the public, using the authority of Science, but really bringing it into disrepute. An awful lot of research money has been wasted in this way and of course much of the work is not reproducible.
评论 #13489081 未加载
unknown_apostle超过 8 年前
Tangentially related, to the fans of Fidel Castro: there&#x27;s an interesting line of thinking that Cubans became healthy not because of Cuba&#x27;s phenomenal health care system, but because they had to simplify their diet considerably in the wake of the Soviet Union&#x27;s implosion. They had to eat homegrown veggies because they had no other choice.
mishkovski超过 8 年前
I like the simplicity of the approach presented in this essay.<p>&gt;<i>And at the end of it all, the answer to the question &quot;Can we say what diet is best for health?&quot; and by health, we mean longevity, vitality, weight control. All the good stuff that we all want. The answer is absolutely no, if what we mean is a very specific, prescriptive — my diet can beat your diet. So, you know, can we say whether the best Mediterranean diet is better than the best vegan diet or that’s better than the best paleo diet for human health? The answer is no. If what we mean, though, by &quot;Can we say what diet is best for health?&quot; is a basic theme of optimal living. Then the answer is a categorical yes. It’s incredibly clear from incredibly voluminous, incredibly consistent literature all around the world, diverse populations, diverse methods, observational epidemiology where you just watch and see what happens. Intervention trials where you assign people to diets. Randomized control trials and real-world experience with large populations like The Blue Zones. And frankly Michael Pollan pretty much nailed this one. Eat food, not too much, mostly plants. That really captures the essence of all of the world’s diets that are associated with good health outcomes.</i><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=lW8C1W1Iefk" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=lW8C1W1Iefk</a>
FajitaNachos超过 8 年前
The first time I saw this quote was at our local Mod Market which has become our goto for a quick, healthyish meal. I wish there were more chains that shared a similar philosophy.
评论 #13488660 未加载
garyrichardson超过 8 年前
I read this book in 2007 when it came out and loosely followed its advice. It changed my life. I dropped 30 pounds, 2 shirt sizes and several inches off of my waist.<p>His &quot;Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.&quot; mantra is about the easiest diet to follow in the real world.
totally超过 8 年前
I remember reading this in the Sunday Magazine when it was first published. It has really stood up to the test of time.
edem超过 8 年前
To skip the boring wall of text scroll to the end and read the 9 points of advice (if you are interested).
reflexive超过 8 年前
Pollan&#x27;s famous &quot;maxim&quot; manages to be condescending, unhelpful and inaccurate - all at the same time.<p>Eat food: duh<p>Not too much: again, thanks?<p>Mostly plants: Oh you mean like, sugars and starches - the most toxic constituents of the modern diet.<p>Pollan is the prototypical Bay-Area insufferable foodie. His documentary was a cringe-fest of pseudo-spiritual fawning.<p>Rene Girard talks about how food has become a new status symbol as people compete for bragging rights about how good they eat; Pollan is their patron saint.
评论 #13489627 未加载
评论 #13490645 未加载
评论 #13489652 未加载
评论 #13503153 未加载
评论 #13489579 未加载