TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google, in Post-Obama Era, Aggressively Woos Republicans

131 点作者 Futurebot超过 8 年前

20 条评论

alphonsegaston超过 8 年前
I'm not optimistic, but I hope that the Trump era finally puts an end to the illusions people had about tech giants as a vehicle for social progress. We're stepping into an era of extreme inequality, authoritarianism, and intolerance, all borne on the back of their rise. They may not be the origin of these trends, but they certainly rode them to tremendous wealth without anything besides the most superficial concerns for their social consequences.
评论 #13503765 未加载
评论 #13503430 未加载
评论 #13504921 未加载
评论 #13503452 未加载
评论 #13503548 未加载
评论 #13503628 未加载
评论 #13504800 未加载
评论 #13507521 未加载
protomyth超过 8 年前
This is probably going to be a hard problem for a lot of companies. Spending quite a lot of money on Democrats and little on Republicans looked like a good strategy given the polling, but now they have to deal with a office holder that is not the least concerned with building bridges and has a bit of vengeful streak.<p>Not to mention all the contacts they have built up in the permanent staff might not be there as long as normal[1]. The typical <i>hire former government workers to lobby current government</i> might also be in danger if the President goes through with his anti-lobbyist rule changes. This is actually a big deal for a lot of people, because these permanent employees are a lot of organization&#x27;s touchstones that cross administrations and party lines.<p>I would advice Google to have a small talk with their doodle team to not rock the boat this year. That might be a signal on how aggressive they really are.<p>1) <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnn.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;01&#x2F;26&#x2F;politics&#x2F;top-state-department-officials-asked-to-leave-by-trump-administration&#x2F;index.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnn.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;01&#x2F;26&#x2F;politics&#x2F;top-state-department-...</a>
评论 #13503360 未加载
评论 #13503308 未加载
评论 #13504283 未加载
评论 #13503566 未加载
评论 #13503747 未加载
AnthonyMouse超过 8 年前
It&#x27;s January. Mark this as &quot;least surprising story of 2017&quot; and it will still be true at the end of the year.<p>Political parties sell themselves to voters as &quot;be on our team&quot;. The other team wants to rape women or murder babies, don&#x27;t vote for them.<p>Corporations vote with money instead of with votes. When you vote with votes and the other guy wins, you lose. When you vote with money and you pay both sides, you always win.<p>Google doesn&#x27;t pay Republicans because they hate women or want to Build A Wall, they pay Republicans because Republicans are now in a position to destroy network neutrality, they don&#x27;t want that to happen, and politicians don&#x27;t listen to corporations who don&#x27;t pay them.<p>Parties constrained by a system do what you would expect them to. If you don&#x27;t like it you have to change the system.
评论 #13503724 未加载
rm_-rf_slash超过 8 年前
The internet as we know it was born in a very unique time in history. Two ideologies feuded for most of a century, and one collapsed at the same time that the other created the internet. The side that created the internet believed that their way of life, government, business, and so on would become the standard around the world, the &quot;end of history.&quot; We believed that the world would stitch itself together and become gradually more liberal and tolerant of the many cultures on this planet. The internet and the collapse of the Soviet Union made that narrative believable, even perhaps inevitable.<p>As a result, we have a very skewed idea of what the internet is or should be. It is no coincidence that the domain for 99% of sites we use is &quot;.com.&quot;<p>The truth is, corporations for decades have become more powerful and detached from their geopolitical circumstances. The subtleties of how the world works is of little relevance to McDonald&#x27;s as long as they can sell more hamburgers. Corporations want to protect themselves from risk so they can continue to amass profits.<p>Therefore, the newfound genuflecting to the GOP should be of no surprise. Google ultimately has a mission to itself and its shareholders first. For a company whose product is its ability to amass information, there is little to be gained in promoting social or economic causes that do not benefit the corporation.<p>Yes, it does suck that the utopian dreams of Silicon Valley have divorced themselves from the liberal idealism of Northern California&#x27;s Vietnam-era glory days, but that is why I left.<p>If you consider yourself liberal and you work for any of these companies that are aggressively courting Republicans, I would be very interested in hearing your perspective.
评论 #13503852 未加载
mrtksn超过 8 年前
Depending on how Protectionist Trump actually becomes, global companies like Google and Facebook may have huge challenges.<p>Russia and China already had the idea of local alternatives and the EU was pushing for data protection for a while.<p>Governments might decide that it is not good idea give that much information about their population to the USA and maybe we will see the end of truly global companies.<p>It might be good for Apple though, as with it&#x27;s strict data collection limitations.
评论 #13503543 未加载
评论 #13503570 未加载
wmeredith超过 8 年前
Gross. I thought a Google in bed with the Obama administration was unsettling. One in bed with the GOP and Trump is terrifying. Google has the keys to the muslim registry, and every other kind of registry you could imagine in every country it operates.
评论 #13503463 未加载
评论 #13504294 未加载
评论 #13503274 未加载
timeisapear超过 8 年前
Shocked? It&#x27;s called lobbying--it&#x27;s been around for decades.
评论 #13503321 未加载
hackuser超过 8 年前
Thank goodness the Republicans and Trump believe in the free market and not government interference in business.
brightsize超过 8 年前
I know of at least one subset of a top-tier federal agency that uses Google&#x27;s .gov services, this[0] I would assume. I wonder what the size of .gov business is for Google and to what extent (vs anti-trust concerns) it factors-in to making nice with the new regime?<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gsuite.google.com&#x2F;industries&#x2F;government&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gsuite.google.com&#x2F;industries&#x2F;government&#x2F;</a>
评论 #13504894 未加载
tn13超过 8 年前
It is weird to begin with that Google would put all their eggs into one basket. Silicon Valley would have looked all idiotic but for Mr. Thiel who invested in Trump.
curt15超过 8 年前
They need to get out in front of Oracle, which is probably the Silcon Valley company least associated with the hippie liberal stereotype and thus most likely to get Trump&#x27;s ear if they want to make life hard for their competitors.
评论 #13503663 未加载
andrewclunn超过 8 年前
So long as the government contracts and regulatory favoritism are such a big part of picking winners and losers you can bet this sort of thing will happen. Now we have a President who knows he won in spite of many of these big money interests (who overwhelmingly backed Clinton). That people here are complaining about the companies for now acting in their own self preservation, while also condemning money in politics is just... well it&#x27;s the sort of double think that is best explained by political tribalism.
aisofteng超过 8 年前
This isn&#x27;t an &quot;about face&quot; - google is continuing to work with the White House, just as it has so far.
anigbrowl超过 8 年前
So much for &#x27;don&#x27;t be evil,&#x27; although that was always more of an ideal than an actual policy guide.
general_ai超过 8 年前
I can&#x27;t believe they&#x27;re stupid enough to think that Trump is a Republican. He&#x27;s neither. Both parties shat all over him during his entire campaign, so he owes them not just nothing, but less than nothing, hence the promise to institute the congressional term limits and anti-lobbying laws. And as everyone discovered over the last week (much to everyone&#x27;s surprise), Trump is the first politician in history that will actually fulfill his campaign promises. There are a lot of really old geezers in Congress, especially on the Republican side, which won&#x27;t like term limits one bit, so it&#x27;ll require some negotiating skill to shove it down their throats. I hope Trump actually manages to pull this off in a way that&#x27;s not easy to undo for president Michelle Obama in 2024.
评论 #13504939 未加载
评论 #13504897 未加载
notpc超过 8 年前
I&#x27;m going to very amused as Google&#x27;s &quot;don&#x27;t be evil&quot; facade comes crumbling down, having lost their revolving door with the US government and protection from antitrust enforcement.<p>Google has a very small business, search &amp; ads, that basically prints money. They then spend almost all of that money on unprofitable operations that crush competition by 1) setting the price-point for many services at free, 2) intercepting customers (e.g. Google Flight and Hotel bookings at the top of search results), and 3) poaching all of the best talent and wasting it away on these terrible side businesses.
justcommenting超过 8 年前
Turncoats.
solotronics超过 8 年前
the very same Google that was funded with CIA money? I think they are more in line with the deep state than either of the two parties
kapauldo超过 8 年前
There arent a lot of republican engineers so this is probably not a big problem for google.
PopsiclePete超过 8 年前
Democrats have been on an incredible losing streak in the past 8 years. Lost the Presidency, House, Senate, Supreme Court, most Governor seats....As a CEO, you&#x27;d have to be pretty crazy to continue supporting the losing side, right?