TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Airbnb is providing free housing to refugees and anyone not allowed in the US

359 点作者 peapod91超过 8 年前

19 条评论

paulsutter超过 8 年前
AirBNB might want to adjust their offer since the majority of the world population are not allowed in the US. Visas are limited by country and can be an arduous process.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Visa_policy_of_the_United_States" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Visa_policy_of_the_United_St...</a><p>Only visitors from the few countries in blue or green are permitted entry automatically:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;File:Visa_policy_of_the_USA.png" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;File:Visa_policy_of_the_USA....</a><p>I mention this without any advocacy for any position, but because some commenters seem to expect that borders are normally open. Every country has similar restrictions. Many countries don&#x27;t admit US citizens without a visa.<p>Edit: Rayiner, I&#x27;m in favor of more and easier travel generally, I&#x27;m referring to the wording of Brian&#x27;s tweet.
评论 #13515247 未加载
评论 #13518706 未加载
评论 #13515770 未加载
rhapsodic超过 8 年前
All of the virtue signaling and moral feather preening surrounding this issue is something to behold.<p>It seems we&#x27;re entering a new era where businesses engage in political activism as well as simple commerce.<p>If that&#x27;s the case, it&#x27;s only fair that other groups, whose politics may differ from the activist-businesses&#x27;, start using politics to weaken those businesses and counter their influence.<p>For example, it&#x27;s well known that Airbnb operates under the radar of housing regulations in many localities.<p>Perhaps people who disagree with Airbnb&#x27;s politics should organize and bring about legislation that will eliminate or severely curtail Airbnb&#x27;s ability to do business in their town, county or state.<p>Or perhaps the Republicans, though new federal liability laws, should render Airbnb&#x27;s business model non-viable at the national level.<p>The left has been engaging in total war against the right for about a decade. They seek to impose social and economic penalties on those who hold political views different than their own. And they&#x27;ve done this, fairly secure in the knowledge that there would be few or no repercussions against them.<p>But I have a feeling that&#x27;s starting to change.
评论 #13515833 未加载
评论 #13515998 未加载
lllllll超过 8 年前
I&#x27;m reading around here that Airbnb&#x27;s contribution in this matter is limited to providing the infrastructure to volunteer hosts for free, which is still good. My question is: do they also provide insurance to these hosts? I mean if one of the volunteer hosts suffers damages in her&#x2F;his property of 10&#x27;000$ hosting refugees, will airbnb cover it? Genuinely curious, not judging here.
评论 #13514845 未加载
rhapsodic超过 8 年前
The tweet should have said, &quot;Airbnb is helping people to provide free housing to refugees and anyone not allowed in the US.&quot;
wyager超过 8 年前
Are they planning to force people on the platform to host refugees (paid, obviously)? I can see several practical problems with that; taking people from their home to a place where they do not speak the language or know the local culture and just dropping them off in standard residential housing can&#x27;t end well for anybody. This also can&#x27;t help AirBnB&#x27;s case when it comes to NIMBYism.
评论 #13513203 未加载
评论 #13513435 未加载
评论 #13512995 未加载
edoceo超过 8 年前
Stunt or Stand? So much noise right now it&#x27;s hard to tell. Hope Time demonstrates this as a genuine move. BigCo with lots of PR weight can really keep the story at the top (or push it over the top)
评论 #13513429 未加载
评论 #13514053 未加载
评论 #13512757 未加载
评论 #13512794 未加载
评论 #13513403 未加载
评论 #13513204 未加载
Neliquat超过 8 年前
No they are not. Please correct the title.
评论 #13514737 未加载
coldtea超过 8 年前
Translation: &quot;AirBnB looks for cheap positive publicity&quot;.
评论 #13515353 未加载
known超过 8 年前
Illegal immigrant? <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.huffingtonpost.in&#x2F;2017&#x2F;01&#x2F;29&#x2F;indian-american-who-inspired-swades-detained-questioned-about-i&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.huffingtonpost.in&#x2F;2017&#x2F;01&#x2F;29&#x2F;indian-american-who-...</a>
icebraining超过 8 年前
So to be clear, Airbnb is helping volunteering hosts to provide their houses for free, right? If so, this tweet is misleading, from its wording I expected Airbnb was compensating the hosts.
评论 #13514676 未加载
camus2超过 8 年前
Airbnb IS NOT providing free housing. Airbnb isn&#x27;t paying for housing refugees. Potential hosts can offer free housing, which just makes Airbnb like Couchsurfing. So Airbnb isn&#x27;t paying for anything here or even giving anything for free.<p>People who really want to help can use CouchSurfing web site instead of promoting a for profit business.<p>If Airbnb offered free housing it would mean they would actually pay the host to house refugees, they are not.
评论 #13515549 未加载
评论 #13514750 未加载
ssijak超过 8 年前
Why have not you done that before for existing homeless people or other people in need? This just smells like ugly marketing scheme.<p>I mean, it is good if someone in need is helped, but why now and why that wording and scope to only refugees?
评论 #13513745 未加载
评论 #13513749 未加载
评论 #13513774 未加载
评论 #13513744 未加载
评论 #13514076 未加载
f137超过 8 年前
Nice test.<p>I wonder how many of the people protesting the entry ban will offer their flats for free to the refugees?
savvyraccoon超过 8 年前
Airbnb&#x27;s investors are happy :)
Dorothy1989超过 8 年前
For unemployed people who have lost their homes and live on the streets or for thousands of homeless poor Americans, AirBn(another Soros backed company) was never so sensitive. But for refugees who can afford the 1000+ $ trip to the States, Airbn is so humane. Please, my mind hurts.
return0超过 8 年前
Unfortunately this will look like a PR move. Why can&#x27;t ordinary people step in to host the people affected for this short period?
评论 #13514047 未加载
flashman超过 8 年前
Airbnb should run a promotion for free nights at hosts who live within a mile of a Trump property. He&#x27;d notice if someone was trying to take business off him, even nominally.
评论 #13513639 未加载
评论 #13513844 未加载
评论 #13514024 未加载
Tulip68超过 8 年前
Excellent news on an otherwise pretty terrible day.<p>Brian Chesky and the entire Airbnb team are showing America at its very best: forward-looking, innovative, diverse, multicultural and. The contrast with the Trump-type people -- primarily angry, insular, bitter old people who are terrified of brown people and still live within 10 minutes of their high school -- could not be more striking.
评论 #13514329 未加载
评论 #13514019 未加载
评论 #13513195 未加载
评论 #13514941 未加载
akjainaj超过 8 年前
If you do this please then release the % of users who&#x27;ve been told &quot;you&#x27;ve been chosen to host a Muslim refugee&quot; and have accepted ;^}<p>It&#x27;s easy to pretend you&#x27;re hospitable and generous when you&#x27;re not paying the toll of your actions. You&#x27;re not providing &quot;free housing&quot;, the actual owners of the houses are. This is a unilateral announcement because you don&#x27;t know if hosts will accept.