<i>It should be noted that unlike competitors, Ember has no corporate backer. Angular has Google in its corner. React is promoted and used by Facebook. Ember lacks this level of support.</i><p>LinkedIn has basically taken on this role as they've hired a lot of core Ember devs. Does Google even count if they don't use Angular internally for anything? (so I've heard...)<p><i>...opting for its own “Broccoli” build tool instead of industry standards like Webpack</i><p>Maybe a good criticism but, no mention of everything being built into ember cli so you don't have to piece together your own mishmash of technologies for every project? This is a serious advantage.<p>Also, he dismisses the convention over configuration of Ember but doesn't mention the value in a new dev being immediately up to speed on how things should be done. Hell, knowing how things should be done for devs that have been on the same team for years is valuable. Ultimate flexibility just allows you to do things differently every time a new page is developed. This is SERIOUSLY annoying and detrimental to every project.