A link to the paper mentioned in the article (paywall/institution access): <a href="http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7838397/" rel="nofollow">http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7838397/</a><p>TL;DR - Much lower erase time than NOR Flash (3 orders of magnitude), 1/3 voltage required for write/erase, all other parameters typically the same<p>The results from the paper are summarized as follows:<p>- Cell size is comparable to current NOR Flash (0.045 um^2)<p>- Endurance is also comparable (~10^5 cycles)<p>- Estimated 10 year retention @105C, compared to 150C for NOR<p>- Read time <25 ns, versus <10 ns<p>- Write time around 500 ns (1/2 of NOR)<p>- Erase time around 500 ns, compared with 10^6 ns for NOR (!)<p>- Energy consumption not yet measured, but claimed less than Flash<p>- Max voltage of 4.5V, versus 12V for Flash