Dear MongoDB users, we welcome you in Azure DocumentDB

126 点作者 jeremya超过 8 年前

19 条评论

morghus超过 8 年前

Yes, except you can't do the most basic things with DocumentDB and it becomes very expensive very fast. Especially if you want multiple collections.There's a lot lacking with DocumentDB, as evident from the feedback forum, that comparing it to Mongo is like comparing an infant to an adult. The infant might be cute, but it can't do a whole lot.<a href="https://feedback.azure.com/forums/263030-documentdb/filters/top" rel="nofollow">https://feedback.azure.com/forums/263030-documentdb/filters/...</a>

评论 #13667951 未加载

mat_keep超过 8 年前

When users have evaluated DocumentDB against MongoDB, they see major shortcomings in Microsoft's offering:"As we were developing our new financial benchmarking service last year, we evaluated Microsoft’s Azure DocumentDB, but MongoDB offered much richer query and indexing functionality"KPMG France <a href="https://www.mongodb.com/blog/post/kpmg-france-enters-the-cloud-era-with-new-mongodb-data-lake" rel="nofollow">https://www.mongodb.com/blog/post/kpmg-france-enters-the-clo...</a>

redwood超过 8 年前

All of the following three share something in common: 1) Microsoft Azure DocumentDB 2) Google Cloud Spanner 3) Amazon Web Services DynamoDBTotal cloud-vendor lock-in. It's clear why the clouds want users investing in these difficult-to-migrate-from solutions...

curiousDog超过 8 年前

Needs more hashtags. Reach all those Millenials graduating $10k 3-month bootcamps. Sigh.

评论 #13666226 未加载

评论 #13667611 未加载

评论 #13667446 未加载

评论 #13669689 未加载

verandaguy超过 8 年前

I've been out of touch with Mongo for a while, but when did it stop being common practice to just hide :27017 behind a firewall with only your app's DB access layer (or, at most, a few nodes in the local subnet) talking to it?

评论 #13666072 未加载

评论 #13667399 未加载

ec109685超过 8 年前

One of the best things about AWS is the "Jeff Barr style" posts describing every service they release. I find them much easier to consume than a blog post like this.

评论 #13668100 未加载

hoodoof超过 8 年前

AWS needs something like this.The missing piece for the AWS serverless story is a database that is suitable for writing real world applications. DynamoDB is far from suitable for that task, which leaves AWS serverless with no good database.

评论 #13666973 未加载

评论 #13666577 未加载

评论 #13667791 未加载

评论 #13666186 未加载

评论 #13666184 未加载

etoykan超过 8 年前

I think Microsoft should implement basic aggregation functions first.

评论 #13667781 未加载

searchfaster超过 8 年前

Interesting... So compatible with Mongodb protocol but not using mongodb internally ?What is your view of services, which provide functionality of some other software or SAAS and is API / Protocol compatible ?Can API / protocols be copyrighted or patented? I believe not based on Google vs Oracle.

评论 #13666527 未加载

supremesaboteur超过 8 年前

> First and foremost, security is our priorityIn response to <a href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/01/09/mongodb/" rel="nofollow">https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/01/09/mongodb/</a> ?"MongoDB databases are being decimated in soaring ransomware attacks that have seen the number of compromised systems more than double to 27,000 in a day."

评论 #13666073 未加载

alexyoung超过 8 年前

As someone that almost got bitten by MongoDB's lax auth defaults, I was happy to read that DocumentDB has enabled access control out of the box and no default username/password.Also, there's a query playground if you want to try it out quickly: <a href="https://www.documentdb.com/sql/demo" rel="nofollow">https://www.documentdb.com/sql/demo</a>

评论 #13667659 未加载

评论 #13670605 未加载

vikestep超过 8 年前

We used to use DocumentDB, but switched to Azure Table Storage a while back. Did some benchmarking and DocumentDB was too slow for our needs (getting documents for a range between two epochs). Not sure if others experienced the same thing or if things have gotten better since then though.

dirkg超过 8 年前

Never looked at DocumentDB before. So if I get this straight, I can get a fully managed DB that can scale easily, but still have all the advantages and compatibility of a regular NoSQL like Mongo?I think that's a first, right?

评论 #13667818 未加载

评论 #13666939 未加载

评论 #13667049 未加载

评论 #13670465 未加载

al2o3cr超过 8 年前

I hear it's got even better write performance than /dev/null ;)

rdiddly超过 8 年前

Potter's paying 50 cents on the dollar for your shares in the Building & Loan...

trustfundbaby超过 8 年前

From frying pan to fire probably.

z0noxz超过 8 年前

Trading privacy for a false sense of security, are we?

评论 #13666102 未加载

joe563323超过 8 年前

Microsoft trying hard to get developers to work on their platform and fail has really become very much fun. Microsoft deserves for being evil. Example: Microsoft does not save history in cmd shell(its so irritating for devs). The height of the cruelty is they aliased the curl and wget by default to its own program(do not remember).

评论 #13668288 未加载

评论 #13668289 未加载

partycoder超过 8 年前

You cannot look at the code, and cannot monitor the infrastructure. The only thing left is trust.Trust in the belief that Microsoft will act in your best interest regarding the privacy of your data.But, isn't reasonable then to ask if Microsoft is actually trustworthy? PRISM, NSAKEY, Flame malware propagating via Windows Update, their 0day policy... I don't think Microsoft is trustworthy.

评论 #13666536 未加载