TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Why Apple is not launching hi-res (24bit) music downloads in iTunes?

2 点作者 anildigital超过 8 年前

3 条评论

gaspoweredcat超过 8 年前
hi res? they dont even offer lossless, which i actually found quite shocking, while scouring the net for a few albums i couldnt find in lossless and having always been a win&#x2F;lin&#x2F;android person i wasnt exactly keen on using itunes but i thought &quot;they have their own codec, ALAC but my player can handle it, ill bite the bullet and sign up&quot;<p>it was only after going through the hassle of setting it all up that i discovered that they dont actually offer lossless for sale only as a ripping option, why they dont offer it i have no idea when other providers manage to do it just fine (bandcamp, 7digital, quobuz, ototoy and others)<p>and i have to argue with others there is a market for hi res audio, tidal just didnt offer it correctly, the selection, app and marketing werent good enough to justify the price, before tidal quobuz actually offered a lossless streaming service too but like tidal it was expensive and somewhat limited, plus in general people getting lossless tracks will often prefer to own the albums, that way they can be played on sources that dont support connections like stand alone DAPs<p>while i tried but dropped both tidal and quobuz streaming i would be happy to pay a few extra quid on top of the cost of premium for a lossless version of spotify.<p>lack of high bitrate i can kind of understand, not everything was mastered in 24bit but there should be CD quality lossless available for almost all tracks<p>id guess another possible reason for their not including 24bit files is the new headphone system, bluetooth is ok and all but isnt the fastest or most reliable standard im not sure about 4.1 but 4.0 has a max throughput of around 24mbps, a 320k (or even less aac or whatever apple use) will be much lighter on bandwidth to those wireless headphones, a 24&#x2F;192 (or worse a 32&#x2F;384) file would be seriously pushing the bandwidth available via bluetooth (yay, wasnt dropping the 3.5mm jack a great idea!) itll change in time of course, it could be mitigated through buffering and such but it would still hammer battery life comparitively
Jonnax超过 8 年前
How do they market it? Tidal showed that people don&#x27;t really care. A lot of people don&#x27;t mind selecting max quality, I&#x27;m sure the extra bandwidth cost is another factor.
Esau超过 8 年前
For the same reason that lossless is not the default - most people can&#x27;t hear the difference.