TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A Google a Day

168 点作者 bharatkhatri14超过 8 年前

19 条评论

BickNowstrom超过 8 年前
These days, you can not have Pub Quizes with at least a few teams cheating by using a phone to Google the answers. Knowing trivia of the top of your head seems to have become as useful a skill as calligraphy.<p>A friend of mine was about to fall for a hoax&#x2F;scam. And even though they changed the words and meaning of quite a few elements, I was able to pinpoint the exact scam using carefully crafted Google queries.<p>With Google there is just no way to bullshit people anymore. Someone would tell a strong story in the 90s during a birthday, and you&#x27;d have to go to library the next day to verify or discard it. Not anymore.<p>Someone asked why those old modems made noise, and instead of giving an answer right away, it took all of 15 seconds to find the answer online, much better than I ever could answer it.<p>I remember my first job skill test. It was multiple choice and you were allowed to use the internet. I answered all questions by Googling keywords from the question, in combination with keywords from each answer, and looking which combination gave the most results. Answering this way I got a near perfect score. There were questions about programming languages I hadn&#x27;t even written a &quot;Hello World&quot;-example for.<p>With all this goodness, comes of course the danger of relying on Google for all your answers. If it is not on the first page of the results it is not true. Especially younger people believe a lot of facts they find online. Another danger is using Google for confirming a bias: With so many pages online, there is bound to be a page in the results that agrees with your initial hunch, however incorrect it is.<p>I participated in the pilot for Google Answers. There were people there that, if the answer was to be found anywhere online, could answer it, no matter their expertise on the subject. Googling well is a valuable skill.
评论 #13728599 未加载
评论 #13728617 未加载
评论 #13729702 未加载
评论 #13728824 未加载
评论 #13728597 未加载
评论 #13729555 未加载
danso超过 8 年前
FWIW, if you enjoy this kind of stuff, you might like Daniel Russell&#x27;s (Google research scientist, creator of A Google A Day) blog on using Google Search for research (and research on how people use search):<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;searchresearch1.blogspot.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;searchresearch1.blogspot.com&#x2F;</a><p>He regularly posts quirky challenges (What kind of cow is in this picture? Can you see the Farallon Islands from San Francisco, and where should you stand at what time of year to best see them?). Also contains lots of useful information about the state of the query and engine, such as which search operators have been deprecated, or which obscure search operators no one seems to know about.
评论 #13728336 未加载
squeaky-clean超过 8 年前
Some of these were neat, some were really stupid.<p>&quot;What do you learn the definition of on page 21 of the 2011&#x2F;2012 Official Rules of the NBA&quot; was &quot;legal goal&quot; really? It doesn&#x27;t say that anywhere on the page. &quot;legal field goal&quot; didn&#x27;t work, &quot;Scoring and Timing&quot; didn&#x27;t work (the header of the page). None of the other definitions on Page 21 worked, there&#x27;s a few. The only mention of &quot;legal goal&quot; is in the Index where it points to page 21.
评论 #13729316 未加载
评论 #13729749 未加载
jannyfer超过 8 年前
In a review of Google Home, I was amazed to learn that you can ask &quot;Who is the guy that plays God in a lot of movies&quot; and Google will answer back with Morgan Freeman.<p>I&#x27;d love to try asking the questions from this site to Google Home and see how it does.
评论 #13728086 未加载
评论 #13728965 未加载
评论 #13727668 未加载
评论 #13730675 未加载
mamurphy超过 8 年前
With this and <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;quickdraw.withgoogle.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;quickdraw.withgoogle.com&#x2F;</a>, whether I want to play super-obscure-trivia or draw stick figures, google has me covered.
评论 #13727475 未加载
stonesam92超过 8 年前
This reminds me of &quot;The Wikipedia Game&quot; we&#x27;d play at school.<p>You&#x27;d all start on one random page, and race to get to some completely unrelated target page, only by clicking through links to other pages.<p>It was always surprising how few degrees of separation there were between wildly unrelated topics.
评论 #13729378 未加载
评论 #13730528 未加载
giarc超过 8 年前
This seems pretty fun however navigation seems a bit difficult. Some links from Google results wouldn&#x27;t open and I had to open in a different tab, then go back to the main tab. Not sure if it&#x27;s my browser or the game?
评论 #13727946 未加载
评论 #13728866 未加载
评论 #13729027 未加载
emodendroket超过 8 年前
Wish it gave me some sense of how my score stacked up to others.
评论 #13727804 未加载
Grue3大约 8 年前
The fact that it requires to type in the exact answer (for its own definition of exact) is annoying. The first question I got was how Hemingway&#x27;s protagonists are called. Let&#x27;s say the answer is &quot;A B&quot;. Well, the answer I had to type in was &quot;The Hemingway A B&quot;. Both &quot;The&quot; and &quot;Hemingway&quot; are mandatory.<p>Later the question was what musical period was the definition of symphony, sonata etc. standartized in. I copy pasted &quot;C period&quot;, it didn&#x27;t work, so I tried some other ones. Well, apparently &quot;C&quot; was the correct answer all along.
schoen超过 8 年前
In the early 1990s there was a very conceptually similar game called the Internet Hunt:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Internet_Hunt" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Internet_Hunt</a><p>An example of the very first one, from August 1992:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ibiblio.org&#x2F;history&#x2F;1sthunt.txt" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ibiblio.org&#x2F;history&#x2F;1sthunt.txt</a><p>Google has definitely made these a lot easier, so the questions have had to get a lot harder!
cryptozeus超过 8 年前
Very hard to use it on mobile phone
gberger超过 8 年前
They should call you out for directly googling the question, as it defeats the point, since you would get the answer only because the exact question was posted on some forum.
wnevets超过 8 年前
I had a trailing space and it said my answer was wrong
评论 #13728551 未加载
notatoad超过 8 年前
this sounds like fun, but the first query i did threw up a firefox &quot;blocked by content security policy&quot; error.
progval大约 8 年前
Looks like a nice way for Google to train a machine learning model to answer trivia questions
评论 #13731290 未加载
magic_beans超过 8 年前
What&#x27;s the point of this? To learn how to use google search?<p>Who is the intended audience?
评论 #13727602 未加载
评论 #13728328 未加载
0003超过 8 年前
Anyone else&#x27;s comp become a turbine?
jeron超过 8 年前
are the questions always the same?
评论 #13728031 未加载
sksixk超过 8 年前
i remember a game very similar to this (that i used to participate in and do very poorly) back around mid 90s that people used to play online. except you&#x27;d use things like archie and gopher. i don&#x27;t remember the details but someone(s) would come up with questions and you&#x27;d have to find the answers online using these tools (before google).<p>anyone remember this game? my recollection is hazy but i think the questions were sent out periodically and teams would rush to get them all answered first.
评论 #13731409 未加载