TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

US billionaire helped to back Brexit

203 点作者 jsvaughan大约 8 年前

19 条评论

FeatureRush大约 8 年前
The main point from this article seems to be that the service was provided for free, without registering it as a donation.<p>Some details on the actual technology are in this related article:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;politics&#x2F;2017&#x2F;feb&#x2F;26&#x2F;robert-mercer-breitbart-war-on-media-steve-bannon-donald-trump-nigel-farage" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;politics&#x2F;2017&#x2F;feb&#x2F;26&#x2F;robert-merc...</a><p>&gt; On its website, Cambridge Analytica makes the astonishing boast that it has psychological profiles based on 5,000 separate pieces of data on 220 million American voters<p>Then there are some speculation what data could it be and how would it be used. From that, it seems that the difference between other &quot;Better audience targeting&quot; tools used for typical commercial advertising campaigns would be mainly scale and accuracy?<p>As a side note, does anyone else thinks that this specific photo in article about manipulation was used to manipulate my emotions and invoke negative view of the other side?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;politics&#x2F;2017&#x2F;feb&#x2F;26&#x2F;robert-mercer-breitbart-war-on-media-steve-bannon-donald-trump-nigel-farage#img-4" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;politics&#x2F;2017&#x2F;feb&#x2F;26&#x2F;robert-merc...</a>
评论 #13736905 未加载
评论 #13736776 未加载
评论 #13736914 未加载
评论 #13737085 未加载
doctorstupid大约 8 年前
It&#x27;s clear that Facebook and its ilk are becoming the gatekeepers to elections and social movements. China must have foreseen this long ago when it blocked them. The means are now in place to steer the governments of the democratic world in the directions preferred by those able to pay Facebook. As an increasingly political group of corporations, perhaps these new social gatekeepers will one day like to do a bit of steering towards their own goals. After all, cybernetics is the art of steering.
评论 #13736622 未加载
coldtea大约 8 年前
So? From Soros to Gates, many US billionaires also helped to back Bremain.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.forbes.com&#x2F;sites&#x2F;derekxiao&#x2F;2016&#x2F;06&#x2F;22&#x2F;from-disaster-to-cobblers-billionaires-weigh-in-on-brexit&#x2F;#3ce2d3867fb3" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.forbes.com&#x2F;sites&#x2F;derekxiao&#x2F;2016&#x2F;06&#x2F;22&#x2F;from-disas...</a><p>Including most of the mainstream media, tv personalities, actors, etc.
评论 #13737564 未加载
mike_hearn大约 8 年前
This is just one of a constant stream of stories from the Guardian that boil down to &quot;people are sheep and their opinions are formed by a sinister conspiracy to manipulate them&quot;. It is a fundamental part of their worldview, which is why they&#x27;re so against referendums to begin with.<p>Indeed, the entire premise of this article is that people make up their mind based on what they see on Facebook, although Leave voters trend old (i.e. the people least likely to heavily use Facebook). The idea that it&#x27;s sinister and scary comes from an academic &quot;expert&quot;. This way of thinking has been pushed so hard by the left wing and pro-EU segment of media and society:<p>• Trust experts, not yourself.<p>• People who disagree with us are merely influenced by lies.<p>• It should be (pro-EU) MPs, not a referendum result, that decides what happens.<p>• When courts overrule referendums, that&#x27;s democracy.<p>• Referendums are a bad idea because the outcome is pre-determined by whoever lies the most&#x2F;spends the most money&#x2F;is best at manipulation&#x2F;etc.<p>It&#x27;s a worldview that dehumanises anyone who disagrees and makes fools of anyone who adopts it, as the endless shrill cries of &quot;what about the £350 million for the NHS&quot; make clear - as if no lies were told by the Remain campaign! Emergency budgets that never happened, an insta-recession that never happened, Cameron saying he&#x27;d stay on and then immediately resigning, Obama saying the USA would shun the UK, the £4300&#x2F;yr figure that was dropped the moment the Treasury produced it because it was clear this &quot;expert prediction&quot; was nonsense, the &quot;we can stay in a reformed EU&quot; despite the actual leaders of the EU saying that wasn&#x27;t going to happen, etc etc.<p>But despite all that, only one side constantly harps on the idea that the vote wasn&#x27;t reliable because of nonsense said by politicians: the side that never believed in voting to begin with.
评论 #13737356 未加载
tomp大约 8 年前
Here is a fascinating (yet very long) account from one of the leaders of Vote Leave campaign, he details the use of Big Data as well.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dominiccummings.wordpress.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;01&#x2F;09&#x2F;on-the-referendum-21-branching-histories-of-the-2016-referendum-and-the-frogs-before-the-storm-2&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dominiccummings.wordpress.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;01&#x2F;09&#x2F;on-the-refe...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dominiccummings.wordpress.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;10&#x2F;29&#x2F;on-the-referendum-20-the-campaign-physics-and-data-science-vote-leaves-voter-intention-collection-system-vics-now-available-for-all&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dominiccummings.wordpress.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;10&#x2F;29&#x2F;on-the-refe...</a>
BillyParadise大约 8 年前
Extraterritorial corporate interests manipulating a decision arguably more important than a single election?<p>Please, help me explore how this is significantly different than the Russia vs US election issue on the other side of the pond.
评论 #13736689 未加载
评论 #13736880 未加载
评论 #13736852 未加载
davidf18大约 8 年前
Mercer does have a point about the bias of MSM: I read NY Times, Washington Post, The Guardian, The Atlantic, WSJ while NY Times, WaPo came out against Steve Bannon for being anti-semitic when he decidedly is very pro-Israel and very against anti-Semitism and yet, didn&#x27;t say a word about Keith Ellison who was running for DNC chair. MSM criticized Trump for not being strong enough on anti-Semitism but where silent about Ellison. Among other things, Ellison was one of only 8 members of Congress to vote against funding Israel&#x27;s Iron Dome missile system -- a system which protected Israeli civilians from Hamas rockets [1].<p>The Anti-Defimation League whose reason d&#x27;être is to combat anti-Semitism came out with a statement against Ellison on Dec 1, 2016,[2] but you won&#x27;t see MSM mention the ADL condemnation of Ellison.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;jpupdates.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;08&#x2F;03&#x2F;rep-ellison-explains-anti-iron-dome-funding-vote-need-cease-fire&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;jpupdates.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;08&#x2F;03&#x2F;rep-ellison-explains-anti-ir...</a><p>[2] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.adl.org&#x2F;press-center&#x2F;press-releases&#x2F;israel-middle-east&#x2F;speech-raises-new-doubts-about-Rep-Ellisons-ability.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.adl.org&#x2F;press-center&#x2F;press-releases&#x2F;israel-middle...</a><p>[3] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;dailycaller.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;11&#x2F;17&#x2F;democrats-must-scrutinize-keith-ellisons-anti-semitic-past-and-ties-to-radical-islam&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;dailycaller.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;11&#x2F;17&#x2F;democrats-must-scrutinize-...</a><p>Of course choosing Ellison as a candidate to lead them was truly a lack of judgment on the part of the DNC but for some reason, NY Times, Washington Post, etc. failed to report Ellison&#x27;s views and the ADL statement.<p>EDIT: The Wall Street Journal, unlike NYTimes and Washington Post does bring up Ellison&#x27;s anti-Semitism, but only <i>after the fact</i>, not before the election:<p>&quot;Mr. Ellison, who is an African-American Muslim, also faced complaints about his past associations with the Nation of Islam and statements he has made that were perceived as criticizing Israel. Haim Saban, an Israeli-American donor who funded the construction of the DNC’s Washington headquarters, in December publicly called Mr. Ellison “clearly an anti-Semite.”&quot; [4]<p>[4] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;democrats-elect-tom-perez-party-chairman-1488054192" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;democrats-elect-tom-perez-party...</a>
评论 #13737533 未加载
评论 #13737768 未加载
评论 #13737561 未加载
owebmaster大约 8 年前
A lot of them (and the secretary of state) also planned and executed the overthrow of an elected brazillian government past year. The spread of american corruption over other countries polítics is absurd. Even more absurd is to see americans attack Trump as if the previous Administration wasn&#x27;t one of the worst for global security.
kkleindev大约 8 年前
What makes a person like Steve Mercer, being extremely well educated and highly successful take part in such dubious procedures? Will a personal experience drive one into being involved in Breitbart and such or is clinical financial calculation fueling such decisions?
评论 #13736783 未加载
评论 #13736644 未加载
评论 #13736702 未加载
bhouston大约 8 年前
Astroturfing things like reddit, twitter, facbook and other forums using AI is likely going to be very effective if it isn&#x27;t already.
评论 #13736967 未加载
评论 #13737065 未加载
评论 #13736722 未加载
chiefalchemist大约 8 年前
This is the second article I&#x27;ve read on this firm. Neither provides proof their means are effective. The only claims made about effectiveness are made by the firm itself. So of course, as a for profit venture, it&#x27;s going to say it&#x27;s worth the money. Of course.<p>As for the rest of the article and the graph of influence. I wish some SC wiz kid would build a &quot;revenue Big Brother&quot; DB so we can see and track all these often nefarious connections. We have video games out the ass but no way of knowing and seeing a graph of relationshios that for all practical purposes paints a picture of corruption. When will we finally get something that useful?
woodpanel大约 8 年前
&gt; Martin Moore, of King’s College London, said that “undisclosed support-in-kind is extremely troubling.&quot;<p>In all fairness: Isn&#x27;t &quot;extremely troubling undisclosed support-in-kind&quot; exactly what Bannon and Mercer are charging the &quot;mainstream media&quot; with?<p>(Disclosure: No Trump supporter, nor Ukip. Not a citizen in both countries)
NPMaxwell大约 8 年前
In terms of how this is done, the Big 5 personality theory is like a squirrel in the movie, Up. The powerful tool is testing how individual level data predicts the incremental impact on behavior of actions (ads etc.) that the campaign promoters can take. The behavior you care about ultimately is voting, and you can&#x27;t train models on voting, but you can train models on campaign donations, Facebook liking, sharing, and copying-and-pasting. These are behaviors that are likely to correlate with voting later. The role of a theory like Big 5 is to help guide the selection of what to test, and is ideally balanced with what is easy to test.
vixen99大约 8 年前
Just out of interest, how many nameless or otherwise, billionaires backed Remain?
评论 #13737226 未加载
dredmorbius大约 8 年前
Media and information systems fundamentally change societies and their power structures and dynamics. They always have. They always will. Often the changes, or at least the immediate periods of change, are highly disruptive, often painful or deadly, sometimes to tens of millions. The dream of uniting humanity through better communications is at best exceedingly incomplete.<p>That idea occurred to me a few months ago. I&#x27;ve been researching it in some depth, and like most good ideas, I&#x27;m hardly the first to stumble accross it. In recent memory, Elizabeth Eisenstein has pursued the idea to a greater extent than nearly anyone else, in particular in her 1980 book <i>The Printing Press as an Agent of Change</i>. Review here (full text available via <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sci-hub.cc" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sci-hub.cc</a>):<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jstor.org&#x2F;stable&#x2F;2779560?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jstor.org&#x2F;stable&#x2F;2779560?seq=1#page_scan_tab_con...</a><p>I&#x27;m aware of a number of those transitions, and there&#x27;s good evidence for nearly all of the corresponding changes.<p>1. Speach and language itself: increased intra- and inter-tribal communications. Strong evidence of rapidly advancing toolmaking, including stone tools, and weapons.<p>2. Writing. Co-incident with the start of civilisation itself, cities, and agriculture. Spread like wildfire from regions in which it first developed over a period of a few centuries for the most part.<p>3. Printing. Moveable type, in Europe, corresponded with thhe Reformation, schism of the Catholic Church, and a continent-wide 30 Years War.<p>4. Incremental improvements in literacy, papermaking, and printing: the American and French revolutions.<p>5. Steam-powered, iron-framed prresses, greatly increased literacy, and much cheaper paper: the Revolutions of 1848, in which 50 nations in Europe and Latin America experienced revolutionary uprisings.<p>6. Mass media, especially radio, public address systems, cinema, audio tape recording, grammaphone, and ever cheaper and faster presses: the rise of Fascism in Italy and Germany, demagogues in the United States (Huey Long, Father Coughlin, Joseph McCarthy).<p>7. In the 1950s - 2010s, mass social movements piggy-backing on radio, mobile PA systems (bullhorns), mass music, television, CB radio, call-in radio, telephones, mimeographs, Xerox machines, Fanzines, dial-up, broadband, and mobile Internet, Web-based apps, social media.<p>Profiling, targeted messaging, and other elements operate similarly.<p>The overall dynamics are complex, and I&#x27;ve omitted other elements, but the overall concept seems quite strong. Many authors have commented on elements of this, though few look to the darker side. Le Bon, Mackay, Bernays, McLuhan, Chomsky, Mander, Shirky, and boyd are among those who have.
brad0大约 8 年前
It&#x27;s depressing to see how our opinions are collectively shaped to further someone&#x27;s agenda.
评论 #13736609 未加载
评论 #13736618 未加载
评论 #13736612 未加载
评论 #13736613 未加载
zakk大约 8 年前
Rich people backing political causes? Is it something new?
guilhas大约 8 年前
Some backed brexit, some backed remain. Bohoo..
gaius大约 8 年前
I am pretty sure that no-one&#x27;s vote was swayed in either direction by either campaign and that every penny spent by both sides was wasted. Whether you are Leave or Remain, that is driven by underlying fundamentals, not by abstract arguments about balances of trade...
评论 #13736658 未加载
评论 #13736666 未加载
评论 #13736682 未加载