TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

VoltDB is out, benchmarks against Cassandra

65 点作者 nprincigalli将近 15 年前

8 条评论

banjiewen将近 15 年前
This reads like marketing-blogspam to me. These two projects solve totally different problems, and the author acknowledges it, yet he still goes on to highlight benchmarks where VoltDB is 10-20x faster than Cassandra. Of course it's going to be! It's an in-memory store!<p>So why benchmark against Cassandra? It's got a lot of buzz around it, of course. What a better way to shove your name into the "NoSQL" ring. Blech.<p>With regard to the numbers themselves, I would refer the author to the CouchDB boys' discussion of benchmarks (under "Good Benchmarks are Non-Trivial"): <a href="http://books.couchdb.org/relax/reference/high-performance" rel="nofollow">http://books.couchdb.org/relax/reference/high-performance</a>
评论 #1381758 未加载
评论 #1381606 未加载
评论 #1381923 未加载
pquerna将近 15 年前
in memory vs not, will always have these kinds of results.<p>most people, most systems, aren't so hot about in memory datastores -- MySQL had MySQL-Cluster/NDB, and for lots of reasons it had trouble ever taking off.<p>For certain use cases, and definitely for benchmarking purposes, in memory datastores will always crush the competitors, but in the end, most people like reliable data storage.
评论 #1381537 未加载
评论 #1381569 未加载
评论 #1382037 未加载
评论 #1381826 未加载
seldo将近 15 年前
I'm at Gluecon, where Mike Stonebraker (CTO of VoltDB) gave a talk about Volt this morning. He's very clear that VoltDB is not a NoSQL product; it's a SQL product, but a next-generation SQL product. He says they've achieved enormous performance gains by keeping ACID compliance by throwing out tons of older tech still present in MySQL and Oracle.
评论 #1381858 未加载
评论 #1382021 未加载
评论 #1382089 未加载
bradfordw将近 15 年前
If he wanted something a bit closer to the voltdb model, why not go with mongo since your writes aren't immediately put to disk? It's more of a measure of how quickly you're shuttling data over the wire.<p>When you agree that it's apples to oranges, why continue?
评论 #1382348 未加载
评论 #1383407 未加载
aditya将近 15 年前
This is cool, eventually we'll have every no-sql use case covered, so there exists a data store which conforms to your applications usage with respect to the CAP theorem...
riffraff将近 15 年前
code and configurations or it didn't happen
codahale将近 15 年前
I see absolutely zero details about the actual configurations of either system. No replicability means it's just another opinion paper.
zipstudio将近 15 年前
I wonder if this DB will be available from any clouds?