I just want to post a few excerpts from court documents that always seem to be missing from these articles. Warning, descriptions of sexual imagery of children.<p>>The picture in question was “of a fully nude, white prepubescent female on her hands and knees on a bed, with a brown choker-type collar around her neck.” (Dkt. 152 at 7.) Presumably in the form of thumbnails, Agent Riley also saw “partial images of genitalia of young girls” and states that “[i]t appeared there was a lot of [child pornography] as the tech didn’t have to scroll, the window popped up with image after image of [child pornography] and child erotica/grooming images.” [1]<p>>A later search of the iPhone revealed alleged child pornography that is charged in Count 2 of the Indictment. [2]<p>On the classification of Best Buy workers as CHS<p>>During 2007 and 2008, I am aware of four employees of Best Buy Geek Squad in Brooks, Kentucky, who contacted us regarding child pornography on customers' devices. To best track the relationship with these individuals and document contacts the FBI had with them, we classified these individuals as confidential human sources ("CHS's"), though they were simply employees at the Best Buy Geek Squad who happened to be in a position to report child pornography that technicians had come across on devices during the course of repair. [3]<p>1. Case 8:14-cr-00188-CJC / Document 173 / Filed 12/19/16<p>2. Case 8:14-cr-00188-CJC / Document 76 / Filed 10/30/15<p>3. Case 8:14-cr-00188-CJC / Document 176-1 / Filed 01/05/17