TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Martin Gardner on Oprah Winfrey: Bright (but Gullible) Billionaire

39 点作者 garret将近 15 年前

3 条评论

Alex63将近 15 年前
Wouldn't it be interesting if celebrities could be sued for malpractice, as doctors can be? Oprah just seems to be a particularly noteworthy example of celebrities who encourage stupidity whether in medicine and science, or politics and economics.
评论 #1387884 未加载
Legion将近 15 年前
Very interesting. I am not an Oprah viewer, but even my limited exposure has left me with a "two Oprahs" impression: one a force of good, and one who provided a platform for pure crap like "Dr." Phil.<p>I was not aware Jenny McCarthy and a whole mess of new age junk were also a part of Second Oprah's repertoire. How disappointing for a woman whose achievements would otherwise merit heaps of praise and respect.
评论 #1388814 未加载
korch将近 15 年前
Doesn't the FDA regulate the specific words that can be legally allowed to describe the stated effects of any medical treatment? Which is why all of the non-regulated pseudo-science drugs have to use generic terms like "you'll feel better, have more energy and be more successful."<p>If Oprah pitches one of these products, she's a paid spokesman for it, so wouldn't drug laws trump free speech here? i.e. Business are not allowed to flaunt the laws and claim they have free speech, but individuals of course are given far more leeway.