TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Homeowners in Foreclosure Find a Rent-Free Approach

27 点作者 mahipal将近 15 年前

7 条评论

tptacek将近 15 年前
What these people are doing is exactly equivalent to what tendentious tenants do to avoid eviction. We almost uniformly hold those tenants in contempt; they're perpetrating a fraud. The only difference here is that it's banks holding the loans, not independent landlords.<p>I see how you could sympathize with a ruthless defaulting homeowner; after all, what else are they going to do? Are we really asking them to vacate <i>early</i> solely to make the bank's job easier? On the other hand: what they're doing is morally indefensible, and any costs to the bank their behavior incurs is largely going to be borne by good-faith mortgageholders and new prospective good-faith home buyers.<p>Maybe they shouldn't be bragging about this. Here's to hoping it catches up with them sooner than later.
评论 #1395765 未加载
评论 #1395768 未加载
评论 #1395782 未加载
评论 #1395785 未加载
评论 #1395786 未加载
icefox将近 15 年前
“We could pay the mortgage company way more than the house is worth and starve to death,”<p>This implies that if the house was worth what they were paying that they would still starve to death and really they made a bad choice in buying the house in the first place.<p>"But the couple also refinanced at the height of the market, taking out cash to buy a truck..."<p>sigh...
评论 #1395741 未加载
patrickgzill将近 15 年前
The banks don't want to foreclose, because they do better with "extend and pretend" ... until the day before the foreclosure they can still carry the worthless loan as an asset at 100% of its original value (if I understand this part of the process correctly).<p>Who is the greater criminal?<p>Some old lady living in a crappy $125K house in Florida--or bank execs who in concert with corrupt regulators are hiding billions in bad loans and meanwhile paying themselves 100K bonuses or more?
评论 #1395784 未加载
edw519将近 15 年前
<i>“They’re all crooks."</i><p>Let me see if I got this right... You borrowed money. Now you choose not to make the monthly payment that you have already agreed to pay. And spend that money on other stuff. And you call them the crooks?
评论 #1395819 未加载
评论 #1395869 未加载
istari将近 15 年前
The Chinese sees the housing crisis from a different point of view: The US cheated China out of billions by selling them bonds backed up by inflated real estate, money saved up by hardworking Chinese. It's a completely different take on the situation.<p>Someone had to provide the money in the first place. That someone sure as hell wasn't the banks, the banks were intermediaries. Often times that someone was a Chinese or German institution chasing higher interest rates with no clear understanding of what was being sold to them.<p>Who benefited from the transaction? Whoever sold the home. A lot of foreign money came into the US and stayed in the US.
tjmaxal将近 15 年前
Imagine I decided to move into a foreclosed home and live there rent free until the banks could legally force me out? What is that called? It's stealing. Every month these people live in these houses they are stealing from the banks. Yes, the banks are at fault for creating the opportunity to get robbed but that doesn't justify the actions of these squatters.<p>Would you say that a rapist is justified in raping someone because they acted in a sexually lewd manner?<p>The "they had it coming" argument just doesn't hold water.
tjmaxal将近 15 年前
Didn't these people learn in grammar school that two wrongs don't make a right?
评论 #1395591 未加载