TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

After vote to kill privacy rules, users try to “pollute” their Web history

63 点作者 Errorcod3大约 8 年前

6 条评论

masonic大约 8 年前
arstechnica is one of the few sites that is accurately stating that these privacy exposures <i>exist now</i> and <i>stem from during the Obama administration</i> (in 2015). It&#x27;s implied in the wording of this article, but their linked article from 24 March spells it out better:<p>&quot;So what has changed for Internet users? In one sense, nothing changed this week, because the requirement to obtain customer consent before sharing or selling data is not scheduled to take effect until at least December 4, 2017. ISPs didn’t have to follow the rules yesterday or the day before, and they won’t ever have to follow them if the rules are eliminated.&quot;<p>Instead of just implementing the late-term Obama rule that was to take effect in December or later, we should be pushing for a <i>more broad</i> replacement rule that also encompasses major content providers such as Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, and Google&#x2F;Youtube.
评论 #14027337 未加载
jimjimjim大约 8 年前
The only beneficial thing that trump has done is to make things that seemed fine while under a &quot;nice&quot; administration show how bad they can be if under a &quot;nasty&quot; administration.
评论 #14027360 未加载
psyc大约 8 年前
Sometimes I think there&#x27;s a day of reckoning coming for many, when tomorrow&#x27;s search engines start surfacing what&#x27;s <i>already</i> on the public internet, about 10x as efficiently as they already do.
imhoguy大约 8 年前
Does it make sense too pollute the web history against ISP as lot of pages become available via HTTPS-only transport nowadays? DNS pollution (script) would be enough IMHO as ISPs capture queries in clear text. Mosty they provide their own DNS servers too. Domain names plus timestamps tell a lot about ones online habits. Of course the better option is to use DNSCrypt, VPN or some DNS tunelling via secure link.
评论 #14028655 未加载
malandrew大约 8 年前
One benefit of widespread adoption even if filtering countermeasures exist is that pollution treatments will cost money to operate, likely undermining whatever profit they might be making from this.
LiweiZ大约 8 年前
I was thinking about having a service to mix a group of users&#x27; exposed information so that other parties could not figure out what a user did. Just like groups of animals do. Very similar to VPN in some way. Anything like this out there for us?