This may be a minor nitpick, or it may be unwarranted entirely, but is the discourse of broadband protections being "revoked/rolled back/taken away" even accurate? It's been my understanding that the rules governing consumer broadband privacy weren't even on the books at <i>all</i>, and weren't planned to be for quite some time.<p>Have I been misunderstanding this aspect of this story, and if so-does anyone have substantive reading material that I can go educate myself on?<p>Granted, the issue has done a good job exposing more evidence of the 'Our politicians have been bought and paid for' and other problems of broadband regulation.