TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

U.S. Launches over 50 Missiles at Syrian Military Base

128 点作者 plessthanpt05大约 8 年前

20 条评论

Zenst大约 8 年前
Well I expect the Doomsday clock will be getting an update soon.<p>I&#x27;m still not convinced that the Chemical Weapons where from Assad or the Russians attack and the probability of them actually being in a weapons store the rebels held, to me seems if not equally probable. Mostly from the aspect that Chemical Weapons in the form of landmine dispersol have been used by ISIS in Iraq. Now the aspect that such types of weapons as a Chemical Weapon dispersal is not one we know that well. So an airstrike upon a weapons depot that had such landmines, could most likely cause the mines to release the chemical weapon. Many experts have said that an airstrike upon a chemical weapon store would destroy the chemical weapons. But we are talking about mines as storage. A factor that may well be overlooked or a large unknown in how they react to airstrikes.<p>What we will know eventually is if they fingerprint the chemical weapon in this Syrian event and compare to that used by ISIS in Iraq then if they are the same.<p>So given how Russia and indeed Assad reacts will prove most telling. I also believe Assad would be totally foolish to use Chemical Weapons, more so with Russian support and no need to use them. This and already gave them up, via Russia and again. There was no need for them and they would know the response if they did, and I don&#x27;t believe even Russia or Assad would be that silly.<p>So from that perspective, Trump just updated the Doomsday clock.
评论 #14056685 未加载
评论 #14056727 未加载
评论 #14056534 未加载
评论 #14057672 未加载
评论 #14061242 未加载
salimmadjd大约 8 年前
Beware of war propaganda. A quick reminder about the first Iraq war and how they lied about Saddam killing babies and used a PR firm in Congressional hearing [0] to build public outrage.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Tom_Lantos#1991_Gulf_War" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Tom_Lantos#1991_Gulf_War</a>
评论 #14056709 未加载
colmvp大约 8 年前
I&#x27;m confused how this is so much more controversial or scary than the drone strikes that have occurred over the last number of years by the US that violated the sovereignty of other countries and resulted in unfortunate death of civilians. For the record, I&#x27;m not trying to compare Obama to Trump but rather the fact that the US has a long history of exerting its will in a methodical way, so I&#x27;m unclear why this is more... serious? Is it because of potential ramifications from Russia? I can&#x27;t quite imagine that they really want to be involved in a hot war with the US and it&#x27;s allies.
评论 #14056607 未加载
narrator大约 8 年前
Does the all run on autopilot? It&#x27;s like this stuff was on the timeline no matter who got elected. They&#x27;ve been deploying all over the South China Sea and Eastern Europe and it all went along smoothly on autopilot right through the election and transition.
评论 #14056785 未加载
评论 #14056575 未加载
评论 #14056593 未加载
评论 #14056624 未加载
Tycho大约 8 年前
If it turns out not to have been an Assad attack then all those in the US government&#x2F;military who pushed for escalation should walk the plank.
abetusk大约 8 年前
Right now this post is ~1 hour old and 88 points yet is nowhere to be seen on the front page. Did this post get forcibly removed?
评论 #14056693 未加载
ourmandave大约 8 年前
We notified the Russians ahead of the strike. No Russian hardware was harmed in the making of this missile strike.
评论 #14056895 未加载
评论 #14056724 未加载
JumpCrisscross大约 8 年前
Hypothesis: this is a message to Xi and North Korea. Syria is a consequence-free zone. Unless we depose Assad and commit to nation building, this has limited non-humanitarian consequence. Bonus: decisive action right after McMasters consolidated Bannon&#x27;s NSC influence.
评论 #14056814 未加载
AnimalMuppet大约 8 年前
And yet just today Rand Paul told Trump not to take unilateral military action, that he needed to clear it with Congress first. (Maybe Trump briefed them. Maybe that&#x27;s good enough, but I think the idea was that Congress needed to have a chance to vote.)
评论 #14056536 未加载
评论 #14056463 未加载
评论 #14056596 未加载
评论 #14056462 未加载
评论 #14056507 未加载
ProfessorLayton大约 8 年前
These situations are always unfortunate.<p>The U.S. does nothing: Innocent people continue to die<p>The U.S. does something: Innocent people die (It is war, after all)<p>Whats worse, is what&#x27;ll happen when one of the strikes inadvertently hits some of Russia&#x27;s troops?<p>Whats the solution to all this?
评论 #14056935 未加载
评论 #14057230 未加载
评论 #14056530 未加载
评论 #14056513 未加载
plessthanpt05大约 8 年前
&quot;THE US has launched a massive cruise missile strike against Syria – despite a warning from Russia not to get involved.&quot;<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dailystar.co.uk&#x2F;news&#x2F;latest-news&#x2F;603497&#x2F;trump-syria-strike-russia-military-action-chemical-weapons-gas-attack-putin-assad-WW3" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dailystar.co.uk&#x2F;news&#x2F;latest-news&#x2F;603497&#x2F;trump-syr...</a>
评论 #14056381 未加载
earthtolazlo大约 8 年前
This is bad. This is very bad.
评论 #14056356 未加载
评论 #14056301 未加载
评论 #14056436 未加载
ralmidani大约 8 年前
As a Syrian-American who voted for Clinton, I am incredibly happy that Trump has shown resolve where Obama failed to. This may not directly cause the downfall of the abominable Assad regime, but at least it will make Assad think twice before using chemical weapons again. Hopefully, it will be followed by safe zones and arming the Free Syrian Army.
评论 #14057881 未加载
评论 #14057891 未加载
locusm大约 8 年前
Its funny what crosses Americas red line, US forces killing over 200 civs in Mosul the other day didnt warrant much outrage.
评论 #14056743 未加载
评论 #14056609 未加载
ddingus大约 8 年前
FUCK<p>Sorry all. That is what I felt on reading this. We just don&#x27;t need war.
holydude大约 8 年前
I as an eastern european am really grateful for US interventions. Better dead than red.
mythrwy大约 8 年前
&lt;comment deleted since people are apparently going to down vote without reading and I&#x27;m not interested in ill thought out flame wars based on superficial party affiliation&gt;
评论 #14056562 未加载
评论 #14056646 未加载
评论 #14059200 未加载
评论 #14056597 未加载
clock_tower大约 8 年前
Wonderful news! Finally, someone standing up to Assad and Putin! Who would have thought it would be the US president who Putin &quot;absolutely didn&#x27;t&quot; put into office?
评论 #14056451 未加载
评论 #14056754 未加载
评论 #14056545 未加载
评论 #14056452 未加载
sandworm101大约 8 年前
Fifty missiles, in an area where US aircraft can operate unfettered if they so choose, seems like a statement that one side doesn&#x27;t want to risk its own people.<p>Even the US has limits. There are only so many Tomahawks ready to go. 59+ is a significant reduction in that number. They won&#x27;t do this again as I doubt they could mount a third such salvo. They need to keep a substantial number of missiles in reserve for taking out air defences in support of a broader air war or special forces operation. The next &quot;message&quot; will therefore come via manned aircraft. That&#x27;s where things between the Russians and the US get tricky. There is only so much airspace over syria.
评论 #14056696 未加载
评论 #14056722 未加载
mamaniscalco大约 8 年前
The ugly truth is that if you want to change a culture you must permeate it. This requires a multi-generational commitment. You can not assault an opposition into compliance. You must defeat its leaders and its men and then squat upon its culture until its children know nothing other than your own culture. This is what our grandfathers understood when they placed multi-generational bases in Germany and Japan. Today&#x27;s metro-sexual culture does not have the understanding nor the resolve for such a commitment.<p>A civilized culture must abhor violence. But it must also be ready to use it when the alternative is to ignore the suffering of others.