TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Myth of the Necessary Jerk

5 点作者 eldridgea大约 8 年前

1 comment

taylodl大约 8 年前
There&#x27;s one way to deal with these &quot;jerks&quot; - cite them as the reason you&#x27;re leaving. Too many people don&#x27;t want to &quot;burn bridges&quot; when leaving and so they talk about new opportunities and blah, blah, blah rather than being truthful and saying they can&#x27;t get along with this person. If you don&#x27;t want to burn a bridge then you can be insightful and say you just can&#x27;t seem to get along with that person, cite the effort you&#x27;ve made in trying to do so, whether you went to your manager, or what have you and that you just couldn&#x27;t make it work and that as a result the working conditions weren&#x27;t the best you thought they could be and that as a result you&#x27;re looking for opportunities elsewhere. You don&#x27;t have to be mean. You don&#x27;t have to be nasty. You don&#x27;t have to throw anyone under the bus. After all, sometimes it&#x27;s just personality clashes. But if HR receives enough honest feedback like this then they may conclude no, it&#x27;s not the people who left, it&#x27;s that person - they&#x27;re a jerk and we need to deal with them. Now everyone is better prepared to identify the jerk more quickly the next time around.<p>Bottom line - all jerks are a drag on a company and none of them are necessary. They&#x27;re a net negative asset whom you&#x27;re better off without.