TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Show HN: DatoCMS, a Client-Friendly CMS for Hugo, Jekyll, Middleman, Etc.

15 点作者 steffoz大约 8 年前

3 条评论

DandyDev大约 8 年前
The thing you offer is a fancy editor for statically generated websites, but for the prices you&#x27;re asking, I would expect you to <i>host</i> the site as well. Also, looking at the videos&#x2F;gifs on your website, it seems to me that the editor isn&#x27;t even truly WYSIWYG. Sure, the text-areas are WYSIWYG, but you&#x27;re not editing the content in the templates themselves, which would be way more useful.<p>I also want to second the suggestion to make this FOSS. I know you fear for the economic repercussions, but unless your product is unique and super game-changing (which IMHO it isn&#x27;t), people will mostly pay for the <i>service</i> they get on top of the product. This can still be a differentiator, even when the software itself is also available as FOSS.
评论 #14120499 未加载
neeksHN大约 8 年前
I wish SaaS companies (not just DatoCMS) would learn that developers will not adopt their products if they don&#x27;t have source access.<p>This product could have easily been FOSS with it&#x27;s pricing model based exclusively on support&#x2F;hosting.<p>If you want early-adopters - be hacker-friendly, not money&#x2F;data-hungry.
评论 #14107012 未加载
MrAwesomeSauce大约 8 年前
I do somewhat agree with the opinion of making it open source. Imagine how much better the platform could be with constant developer input. But I understand that might not be an easy decision to make.<p>I&#x27;ve used DatoCMS and I actually really liked it. However the pricing model is quite steep for the service it provides. I feel that if open sourcing isn&#x27;t in the horizon, at least consider expanding what the Free and Basic models provide.
评论 #14120513 未加载