TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Sylpheed – a simple, lightweight but featureful e-mail client

172 点作者 generic_user大约 8 年前

20 条评论

SwellJoe大约 8 年前
The screenshots on the page don&#x27;t really do it justice. I mean, it&#x27;s not the most beautiful email client in the world, but it doesn&#x27;t look like 2001. Because it uses GTK it looks like the rest of your desktop (assuming your desktop is GNOME).<p>I always end up going back to Thunderbird, for a variety of reasons. But, I try a bunch of other stuff every now and then. Sylpheed is not bad, but it&#x27;s not got anything I don&#x27;t get from Thunderbird, and Thunderbird is more actively maintained and has more capabilities. (I keep trying Evolution, and <i>hating</i> it, every single time. It&#x27;s huge and thinks really hard about every single action and continues to be buggy. I don&#x27;t know how something has been in really active development for decades and still has weird quirks and misbehavior without any actionable error messages.)
评论 #14127669 未加载
评论 #14127424 未加载
评论 #14127645 未加载
评论 #14130607 未加载
评论 #14127973 未加载
morimoritokyo大约 8 年前
Sylpheed is my all-time favorite e-mail app.<p>In late 2001 I brought a Vaio C1 [1] back from Japan. 192 MB ram, Transmeta Crusoe processor that could burst to 600 MHz. Running Windows ME _everything_ was slow out of the box, but with Linux (Slackware), a minimal window manager (forget if it was XFCE, Enlightenment, or something else), and Sylpheed it just flew. Even with huge numbers of messages everything was snappy. It was amazing.<p>I switched from Linux to Mac in 2009 and migrated to Mail.app at the time. It&#x27;s not terrible, but even on recent hardware it feels more sluggish than Sylpheed did on that underpowered ultraportable in 2001.<p>Good to see that it&#x27;s still getting occasional updates 16 years later.<p>1. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sony.jp&#x2F;ProductsPark&#x2F;Consumer&#x2F;PCOM&#x2F;PCG-C1VSX&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sony.jp&#x2F;ProductsPark&#x2F;Consumer&#x2F;PCOM&#x2F;PCG-C1VSX&#x2F;</a>
评论 #14130849 未加载
评论 #14129725 未加载
评论 #14130682 未加载
uzoodoo大约 8 年前
How does it compare with Claws Mail [0]?<p>I&#x27;ve always assumed Claws is the more full-featured fork of Sylpheed, but seeing that they&#x27;ve diverged over a decade ago and are both still in development I&#x27;m curious how they compare.<p>[0] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.claws-mail.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.claws-mail.org&#x2F;</a>
评论 #14127713 未加载
评论 #14130490 未加载
dfox大约 8 年前
For last few years (after geting bitten by yet another breakage when upgrading evolution) I&#x27;m using claws-mail which is fork of sylpheed and it does everything I need from email client (and in contrast to evolution it even has usable windows version).
评论 #14127417 未加载
krick大约 8 年前
Not unlike many others, I use Thunderbird and sometimes think about switching to something else (main reasons are speed and usability). But I guess what many of us need much more than better email client is better email workflow. I have dozens of filters and always keep my inbox empty, and yet I think may be the real thing is I don&#x27;t really manage my emails properly. Maybe I just need to set up this filter to delete stuff instead of moving it (I&#x27;m not really keen on deleting stuff in general, always feels unsafe and shortsighted), maybe I need some other system.<p>By the way, using Gmail web-interface (and Gmail is not the only mail provider I use) feels almost as unsatisfactory, as Thunderbird: ok, filters and search are a bit better, and it physically cannot hung-up my whole system under load, but otherwise it is as needy and clumsy as Thunderbird. I remember receiving several thousands of emails overnight because of some programmers mistake, and deleting it was quite painful: I&#x27;d gladly tell Gmail &quot;just delete all this stuff&quot; (by filter), but I didn&#x27;t find any way to do so, I had to fall back to slowly manually deleting my mail by 200-item batches.<p>Would be interesting to hear how other people manage their mailboxes.
vanous大约 8 年前
HTML vs plaintext<p>The plaintext email only nature resonated with me for long time but many email and chat services have gone rich text and it&#x27;s great. Why I say that...I used to use claws mail for many years for business email but being able to at least make text bold or add an inline image is valuable. For personal email mutt is great for me and Gmail too nowadays but for business to business, HTML is required.<p>It took me a while to get Thunderbird to mimick Claws. Thunderbird is much slower and crashing randomly frequently but is the best from the crowd.<p><i>Does Claws Mail allow me to write HTML styled messages?<p>No. A discussion has gone around over this topic, and the outcome was that HTML mail is not wanted. If you really need to send HTML, you can of course attach a webpage to an e-mail.</i><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.claws-mail.org&#x2F;faq&#x2F;index.php&#x2F;General_Information#Does_Claws_Mail_allow_me_to_write_HTML_styled_messages.3F" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.claws-mail.org&#x2F;faq&#x2F;index.php&#x2F;General_Information#...</a>
评论 #14129461 未加载
sigi45大约 8 年前
Wow its ugly.<p>While people might or not might trust google etc. The spam filter and the ui from gmail is just to good to switch to any offline client.<p>I&#x27;m only using thunderbird for pgp mails.
评论 #14127532 未加载
评论 #14127527 未加载
评论 #14127515 未加载
评论 #14127939 未加载
评论 #14127653 未加载
评论 #14128508 未加载
评论 #14127706 未加载
评论 #14127574 未加载
评论 #14128196 未加载
评论 #14130789 未加载
popey456963大约 8 年前
Must admit I am somewhat jaded with current mail applications and actually creating my own. Sylpheed is wonderful and the one I currently use, it&#x27;s fast and works. My problem is with the GUI. Every single linked email client in this thread looks like it has come from 2005 and, unsurprisingly, most of them were created around then.<p>Hoping that maybe by using some more modern libraries, and aiming for a material design-esque client, I might be able to make something easy to use and reliable.
评论 #14129477 未加载
评论 #14129971 未加载
评论 #14127824 未加载
评论 #14127850 未加载
Fice大约 8 年前
I used Sylpheed a lot in the past. Very fast, clean, simple and reliable. But switched to Notmuch (with Emacs UI) years ago for its great flexibility and programmability, and due to my general preference for using Emacs modes over separate applications.
评论 #14128186 未加载
narga大约 8 年前
Sylpheed is lack of good HTML render engine. That&#x27;s why I still not change to Claws or Sylpheed because its. This time is 2017, and I don&#x27;t want to read and imagining about the figure that was appeared as text description in email.
评论 #14133416 未加载
评论 #14129859 未加载
darklajid大约 8 年前
Trojita is my client of choice so far, I might have to reevaluate that again?
评论 #14128249 未加载
评论 #14127678 未加载
评论 #14129423 未加载
mintplant大约 8 年前
As a point of comparison: why should I switch from Thunderbird to Sylpheed?
评论 #14127812 未加载
评论 #14127505 未加载
评论 #14127926 未加载
self_awareness大约 8 年前
I&#x27;m yet to see a mail client that allows me to <i>rename</i> all contacts that have a specified email, then search by using those changed names. I mean, I don&#x27;t want to get e-mails from &quot;F4taL ErRoR &lt;error404@gmail.com&gt;&quot;, I want to get e-mails from &quot;John Smith &lt;error404@gmail.com&gt;&quot;. Some clients kind of allow me to do that kind of aliasing, but then indexing and searching for those aliases don&#x27;t work. Claws mail is one of them, Thunderbird as well.
soufron大约 8 年前
I&#x27;ve used Sylpheed for years and I miss it. I stopped using it because I switched to OSX at some point. But it&#x27;s a beautiful piece of software.
评论 #14127463 未加载
hexmiles大约 8 年前
slighty off topic, but there are mail client that support at-rest encryption?<p>For varius reason i need to run a mail client from a usb key, and i could&#x27;t find a client that support the ability to encrypt the mailbox (also with addressbook and for windows). Veracrypt and similar solution are not applicable in my case.
评论 #14127898 未加载
评论 #14129778 未加载
评论 #14128265 未加载
drvortex大约 8 年前
I cannot understand the relevance of an email client, now that browsers can do email. It may be my workflow, so I will ask:<p>Is there any scenario where an email client would be necessary - i.e. a browser based solution will not work?
评论 #14130045 未加载
评论 #14129785 未加载
fabiofzero大约 8 年前
Wow, this brings back memories! I used Syplheed Claws when I was still running Mandrake - before it was merged and became Mandriva.
screed大约 8 年前
last version for macOS 18 Apr 2014
dim13大约 8 年前
Does it still misses RFC 2177?
评论 #14128055 未加载
yeahGreat大约 8 年前
Not to be confused with:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Silpheed" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Silpheed</a>