TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Apple faking 489 to 815 PPI on iPhone 4 ads

81 点作者 pmikal将近 15 年前

15 条评论

MarcusA将近 15 年前
Also, none of my friends are as attractive as the models used on the Facetime page. Stop faking my friends. Apple, please fix this.
评论 #1414376 未加载
评论 #1415445 未加载
rbranson将近 15 年前
Isn't this obvious to anyone seeing the ads? I don't think people skiing are actually going to fly out of my TV when I see those ads, or that a humanoid rabbit is actually going to try to steal my Trix.
评论 #1414385 未加载
pchristensen将近 15 年前
I also posted this on the article:<p>No one that sees these videos or ads on the web will be using a 300dpi screen so they need to overcompensate. A more interesting comparison will be what resolution they show in their print ads.
评论 #1414537 未加载
评论 #1415673 未加载
评论 #1414514 未加载
Groxx将近 15 年前
Actually, I just realized... for the <i>effect</i> of what they're claiming (pixels smaller than you can see), this is a perfect comparison. Blocks to none. Sure, they're achieving it by bending the rules, but I got the impression that 300dpi played second fiddle to <i>"your eye is unable to distinguish individual pixels."</i>[1]<p>[1] <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/features/retina-display.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/iphone/features/retina-display.html</a><p>edit: their side-by-side comparison shows the correct number of pixels between the two.
评论 #1416003 未加载
SandB0x将近 15 年前
I liked the old adverts that tried to show you how sharp DVDs were...on VHS.
评论 #1414501 未加载
miguelpais将近 15 年前
It was not the high-quality of the "a" on the right that was exaggerated, it was the low quality of the one on the left.<p>The "a" on the right is fine, it is there to represent the kind of image in which you no longer are able to detect pixillation, going above of the supposed 300dpi limit, like what would happen on the iPhone4. On the other hand, presenting on the left an "a" with half the quality of the one on the right would probably be too difficult for people to spot the difference.<p>If they were fair on that slide, it probably would be interesting to analyze if people would really notice the difference or if they would just pretend they did (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emperors_New_Clothes" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emperors_New_Clothes</a>). Sure thing, it would not have that much of an impact, at least until all of those people get the chance of having the new iPhone in their hands.
评论 #1414890 未加载
not_an_alien将近 15 年前
Adding to that the fact that their clever semantics is making it <i>sound</i> better than it is (claiming '4x more pixels' - which is true, but it's just 2x the resolution)...<p>It's the best mobile device screen out there, hands down. They really don't need to do that.
thenduks将近 15 年前
People always seem to forget that this is <i>marketing</i>. They're trying to show what the difference is <i>like</i>, they don't need to be exact.
评论 #1414838 未加载
smackfu将近 15 年前
I was wondering about that. It did look like the "after" image was just someone using the font at full resolution, rather than being properly scaled down.
alanh将近 15 年前
The ratios in the demo are correct if you compare them not to the iPhone 3G but to desktop monitors at 72dpi.<p>But seriously, this is all to demonstrate the difference. It’s not a ‘claim’. After all, 815dpi will look the same to the human eye as 370dpi…
评论 #1415315 未加载
seanalltogether将近 15 年前
Is 300 really the max of the eye, I wonder how that is calculated. For instance, if you had a 1 pixel line at about a 15 degree angle, does that mean you would see no aliasing effects?
评论 #1414579 未加载
gaborcselle将近 15 年前
I don't understand how the author of this article gets his numbers of 489 to 815 PPI. Can someone explain this?
评论 #1414984 未加载
fleitz将近 15 年前
From the article: "Do you really need 300 PPI on a 3.5 inch phone?"<p>Do you really need a phone? Marketers don't sell needs, they sell wants.
hackermom将近 15 年前
This is a bit of sensationalist non-news, isn't it? I mean, we all know how exactly <i>every single computer software/hardware manufacturer</i> always use "resolution-less" photographs in their ads on computer screens, cellphone screens and so on.
评论 #1414642 未加载
draper将近 15 年前
"So you’re calling Apple out on their supposed exaggeration of the pixel density<p>based on… Screenshots from compressed videos?"<p>unbelievably dumb blog post.
评论 #1415335 未加载