TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Surface area required to power the whole world by solar power

18 点作者 obsaysditto将近 15 年前

10 条评论

mseebach将近 15 年前
The area needed is not really a problem for solar power. It's storage. We need power when it's dark, probably even more then than when there's daylight.
评论 #1418153 未加载
评论 #1417966 未加载
评论 #1417548 未加载
评论 #1417649 未加载
评论 #1417522 未加载
aidenn0将近 15 年前
So anyone who thinks we can manufacture nearly 500 billion square meters of solar panels by 2030, raise your hand.<p>It seems clear that if we were to do this it couldn't be all photovoltaics. Even with concentrating solar cells that's a lot of silicon and/or more rare elements (indium etc.).<p>With solar-thermal added into the mix it becomes potentially feasible, but who is going to fund a huge solar farm in the middle of a politically unstable region like north africa?
评论 #1417638 未加载
jmhobbs将近 15 年前
Let's just go ahead and start on the Dyson Sphere.
WiseWeasel将近 15 年前
Finally, a good use for Arizona.
chaosmachine将近 15 年前
The infographic claims it will take about 500000 square kilometers of solar panels.<p>1 square kilometer is one million square meters (1000x1000).<p>At a cost of $100 per square meter, that's $100,000,000 (one hundred million dollars) to complete 1/500000th of the project.<p>Did I make any mistakes?
评论 #1417670 未加载
azim将近 15 年前
There has been some pretty interesting research in to storing energy in molten salts. This is a bit different than the photovoltaic cells which I believe this map is referencing; It involves capturing heat and turning it in to electricity rather than light. This is mainly just research right now, but if it pans out it could potentially be much more practical than photovoltaic cells because it doesn't require as many precious materials to manufacture and stores energy at night. See: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_tower" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_tower</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_energy_storage" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_energy_storage</a>
DanielStraight将近 15 年前
I can't get the original to load, but at least this page links to it:<p><a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/09/surface-area-required-to-power-the-whole-world-with-solar-power-wind.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/09/surface-area-require...</a>
评论 #1417707 未加载
RyanMcGreal将近 15 年前
The linked page on what will happen in 2012 [1] doesn't increase my confidence in the information presented herein.<p>[1] <a href="http://www.2012officialcountdown.com/?a=osn2003" rel="nofollow">http://www.2012officialcountdown.com/?a=osn2003</a>
techiferous将近 15 年前
This surface area is roughly equivalent to the size of Montana (or the size of Germany).
terra_t将近 15 年前
Not "with solar panels alone" but with lots of batteries.<p>Seawater Uranium and Thorium from Monazite are much more credible energy resources.