TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

NASA's Peer-Reviewed EM Drive Paper Has Finally Been Published

177 点作者 mastarubio大约 8 年前

10 条评论

themeddler大约 8 年前
This was published November 17, 2016. It's been officially published for several months.
评论 #14200579 未加载
评论 #14201617 未加载
MPSimmons大约 8 年前
November of 2016
stevendhansen大约 8 年前
There has been some good discussion on Reddit about how the thrust results shown in the paper are still most likely measurement errors due to thermal effects. It is a shame that they haven&#x27;t released their actual data for independent analysis.<p>Link: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;Physics&#x2F;comments&#x2F;5ewj86&#x2F;so_nasas_em_drive_paper_is_officially_published&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;Physics&#x2F;comments&#x2F;5ewj86&#x2F;so_nasas_em...</a>
评论 #14201421 未加载
saagarjha大约 8 年前
Paper listed in article, <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arc.aiaa.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.2514&#x2F;1.B36120" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arc.aiaa.org&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.2514&#x2F;1.B36120</a>, appears to cost well over a thousand dollars to access. I found <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ntrs.nasa.gov&#x2F;archive&#x2F;nasa&#x2F;casi.ntrs.nasa.gov&#x2F;20170000277.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ntrs.nasa.gov&#x2F;archive&#x2F;nasa&#x2F;casi.ntrs.nasa.gov&#x2F;201700...</a> online; I think it&#x27;s the same thing.
评论 #14200366 未加载
Jedd大约 8 年前
NASA has published this paper. These guys presumably know what they&#x27;re talking about. Moon landing, space shuttle, Voyager, etc. They ran actual experiments on this drive.<p>Why are half the comments here saying &#x27;They must be wrong&#x27; - seemingly based on nothing more than a strong belief that NASA <i>must</i> be wrong.
评论 #14201320 未加载
评论 #14201350 未加载
评论 #14201268 未加载
评论 #14201455 未加载
评论 #14203674 未加载
评论 #14201344 未加载
aeleos大约 8 年前
Seems like the previously leaked 1.2 ± 0.1 mN&#x2F;kW is true. I look forward to seeing it tested in space to finally see if its real or not.
评论 #14200951 未加载
评论 #14200927 未加载
AndrewDP大约 8 年前
The quote of interest (being able to be tested in months) references another article where nothing has been committed but could be done in 6 months.<p>On one hand it&#x27;s great that this is being reviewed and tested. The other hand, that it&#x27;s not getting properly tested in space where it really can make a difference is somewhat saddening. Can anyone point to a committed space trial?
评论 #14200528 未加载
评论 #14200635 未加载
davesque大约 8 年前
What ever happened with the German result that showed no thrust when the device was hooked up to an on-board battery?
评论 #14201488 未加载
评论 #14201483 未加载
goodcanadian大约 8 年前
As always, the relevant XKCD: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;955&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;955&#x2F;</a><p>While I don&#x27;t really believe it, I am intrigued by the possibility. It has been a long time since we learned anything truly new in physics. The recent breakthroughs (Higgs boson, gravitational waves, for example) were satisfying, but not surprising. I would desperately like to be surprised.
评论 #14200429 未加载
评论 #14200611 未加载
buschtoens大约 8 年前
Ugh, science alert. <i>sigh</i>