TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

NeoVim 0.2.0 released

319 点作者 eugene_pirogov大约 8 年前

15 条评论

fcanela大约 8 年前
Major version can make someone think nvim is still unstable. My experience is the opposite.<p>I have being using it for 2-4 years (can&#x27;t remember exactly) and got the same 0 problems I run into Vim. Earlier versions required you to recompile NeoVim to enable new features for plugins.<p>Yesterday I installed NeoVim in my new laptop and it was a smooth experience: Installed it using Ubuntu package manager, installed Vim-Plug for managing plugins, copied my old init.vim (or .vimrc), run vim and everything in order.<p>I am really happy with NeoVim. I faced no problem with it that Vim could not resolve but I know the insides being a better ecosystem for core and plugins developers, so I will stick with it.
评论 #14246828 未加载
评论 #14245129 未加载
ptero大约 8 年前
I have been using Vim as my primary editor for many years and am happy with it. People I know who use developer editors are split between Vim and Emacs. Neovim usage is minimal. Why? It is an honest question.<p>I see developers of the <i>editor</i> happy, which is a good thing, but IMO to get more users NV must show why it is better from a user perspective -- have several demos on the powerful things easily achieved with NV that are painful with Vim (via plugins is OK).<p>If NV devs can do this, it will go far. If not, then the case for an upgrade hasn&#x27;t been made yet for most users. My 2c.
评论 #14245245 未加载
评论 #14245263 未加载
评论 #14245561 未加载
评论 #14246524 未加载
评论 #14245336 未加载
评论 #14245278 未加载
评论 #14245221 未加载
评论 #14246871 未加载
RubenSandwich大约 8 年前
Regardless if you feel like if the NeoVim refactor is worth it or not we can all agree that it is tremendous effort to modernize code written over the course of decades. Great job guys on another release!
评论 #14244982 未加载
shakna大约 8 年前
&gt; This release features a macOS pre-built package.<p>Yay, no more compiling to upgrade!<p>&gt; Windows is no longer &quot;experimental&quot;, it is fully supported. &gt; Windows package includes a GUI, curl.exe and other utilities.<p>Awesome. Well thought-out.<p>&gt; 1215084 backtick-expansion works with shell=fish #6224<p>Solves one of my main problems.
评论 #14245070 未加载
lunixbochs大约 8 年前
This release fixes one of the biggest bugs with asynchronously embedding Neovim (some input states would just block the API), and makes ActualVim more reliable as a result. Neovim embedding works pretty well now, and will only get better. I&#x27;m hoping it will be possible soon to embed the entire Vim experience into another editor with little to no tradeoffs on either side. I&#x27;ve been impressed when interacting with the Neovim developers.
评论 #14246914 未加载
评论 #14246493 未加载
musaffa大约 8 年前
I use Neovim on daily basis. It works really well. It requires tremendous efforts and love to transform a huge archaic code base into a much modern one. Thanks, Neovim team!
评论 #14245493 未加载
oblio大约 8 年前
My God, it&#x27;s full of stars :)<p>&gt; Windows support:<p>&gt; Windows is no longer &quot;experimental&quot;, it is fully supported.<p>&gt; Windows package includes a GUI, curl.exe and other utilities.
评论 #14245049 未加载
stewbrew大约 8 年前
I understand why they started neovim, but don&#x27;t think the split between vim 8 of today and neovim is a good thing. Makes me think of emacs vs xemacs but worth because they use slightly different dialects of vimscript (closures, currying in vim 8, different api for asynchronous calls). I personally wish they&#x27;d meet on some common, standardized ground. This would require both parties to accept they are not alone though.<p>Edit: I realize that &quot;Vim 8 features: partials, lambdas.&quot; might solve part of my problem.
评论 #14245197 未加载
评论 #14245191 未加载
garou大约 8 年前
The efforts of Neovim team are well-intentioned and we are seeing it shaking the ViM development. (the previous major version from (7.0) 2006, before it (6.0) 2001).<p>We love updates after all.
评论 #14247799 未加载
adrianN大约 8 年前
I&#x27;m currently using vim and I&#x27;m quite happy with it. I don&#x27;t use many plugins, so better support for plugins is not very helpful to me. Are there other reasons why I should switch to Neovim?
评论 #14245636 未加载
评论 #14245005 未加载
评论 #14245140 未加载
评论 #14245138 未加载
评论 #14245477 未加载
评论 #14245151 未加载
评论 #14245868 未加载
评论 #14244951 未加载
voidz大约 8 年前
The only thing that bugs me about neovim is that it seems to require workarounds to get the escape button to behave the same as in vim. When I press escape to exit insert mode, there is a small delay. If I press a key (e.g. &#x27;j&#x27; to go down) too quickly after Escape, it inserts the &#x27;j&#x27; and cancels what escape is meant to do.<p>In tmux I know of a workaround (iirc, &#x27;set escape-delay 0&#x27; or something similar), but I wish I didn&#x27;t have to change a tmux setting so one program can function. It&#x27;s really annoying.. but ultimately worth it, I guess.<p>That said — to the neovim team: congratulations ​on reaching the 2.0 milestone!
评论 #14268936 未加载
mikaelj大约 8 年前
Hope someone (not me!) starts working on a nvimclient (akin to emacsclient) soon.
评论 #14245046 未加载
评论 #14249629 未加载
JdeBP大约 8 年前
My first impression was not a good one. Its hardwired assumption of xterm control sequences, even when TERM says something else entirely, caused it to be unusable on my terminal (which understands DECSLPP as DECSLPP).<p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;neovim&#x2F;neovim&#x2F;blob&#x2F;v0.2.0&#x2F;src&#x2F;nvim&#x2F;tui&#x2F;tui.c#L423" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;neovim&#x2F;neovim&#x2F;blob&#x2F;v0.2.0&#x2F;src&#x2F;nvim&#x2F;tui&#x2F;tu...</a>
评论 #14251652 未加载
erikb大约 8 年前
I&#x27;d say the info provided in the github releases is interesting, but it doesn&#x27;t provide the necessary oversight a general info text would give. Can&#x27;t really say what happened. Even if it was a stabilizing release it would be nice to see that somewhere.
hestefisk大约 8 年前
Any reports on how stable the Windows release is?
评论 #14247384 未加载