TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Inside VW’s Campaign of Trickery

112 点作者 iamjeff大约 8 年前

9 条评论

PythonicAlpha大约 8 年前
I am ashamed, that my government (the German one) has effectively helped to cover things up for decades now in the EU and they are still doing it.<p>They are still blocking realistic pollution regulations for cars in the EU and they help car manufacturers to come away with their manipulations in the EU without real sanctions.<p>In the US, buyers of such cars get a compensation. In Germany, they will never get a penny.<p>But what is worse, people get sick and die (+) because of air pollution in the EU and everybody knows it and they just ignore it or downplay the problem.<p>(+) the numbers of pollution related illnesses is on the rise and medical studies verify the fact that it is a problem.<p>In many cities now, we have regularly pollution values high above thresholds, but also here, the government and local authorities block effective countermeasures.<p>It is so bad, that (a newer study found out) cars which should be better in pollution because of EU regulations (so called EU5) are sometimes even worse than their predecessors (EU4), because the EU willingly puts a blind eye on real pollution values.<p>And it is all, because the German government wants to protect German car producers.<p>I hope, E-Mobility will kill German car manufacturers. And I know, that it will be bad for my Home-country, but they (the manufacturers) deserve it, since they did not care about real clean cars for so long.
评论 #14286264 未加载
评论 #14285652 未加载
wimagguc大约 8 年前
Does any of this matter when, people just don&#x27;t care? In 2016 VW sold more cars than any of the years before, and surpassed Toyota as the world&#x27;s largest automaker [1]. I understand that regulators could issue sale bans or fines or what not -- but these will be set in a small subset of countries only, and even there: &quot;(VW) ...had continued to sell cars with illegal software, including 2015 models.&quot;<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.usatoday.com&#x2F;story&#x2F;money&#x2F;cars&#x2F;2017&#x2F;01&#x2F;30&#x2F;volkswagen-toyota-world-largest-automaker&#x2F;97234320&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.usatoday.com&#x2F;story&#x2F;money&#x2F;cars&#x2F;2017&#x2F;01&#x2F;30&#x2F;volkswa...</a>
评论 #14285182 未加载
评论 #14285477 未加载
评论 #14286195 未加载
评论 #14284767 未加载
评论 #14286531 未加载
评论 #14293762 未加载
评论 #14287208 未加载
评论 #14284647 未加载
Reason077大约 8 年前
The US is lucky to have strong and effective regulators like CARB and the EPA.<p>Europe&#x27;s lack of effective emissions regulation (and enforcement) allowed VW and others to get away with selling polluting toxic vehicles for years.<p>In fact, despite all that&#x27;s happened in the US, in Europe they&#x27;re <i>still</i> getting away with it today.
评论 #14284488 未加载
评论 #14285691 未加载
评论 #14292962 未加载
评论 #14284455 未加载
评论 #14286144 未加载
awjr大约 8 年前
Let&#x27;s be clear, CARB and the EPA would have completely missed this. It was specifically the work by the students. I do wonder if it was pot luck they got hold of a VW Jetta.<p>In the EU you have a similar cover up going on around diesel in general. For over 20 years people have known how bad diesel is, but the EU pushed it&#x27;s low carbon emissions agenda promoting diesel cars and has not stepped back from it. Even now governments have successfully lobbied to relax the EU emissions limits.<p>The realistic option is to ban the sale of diesel cars and require all other vehicles to be retrofitted with NOx filters.
评论 #14285212 未加载
sundvor大约 8 年前
Yet in Australia, we&#x27;ve been told that the &quot;fix&quot; is in most cases a mere software update:<p>&quot;The update for the majority of affected vehicles is an update to the vehicle software. This adjustment will be relatively quick and has been made possible with advances in diesel engine technology. Some vehicles will additionally be fitted with a minor hardware update.&quot; (1)<p>It just doesn&#x27;t add up. If it was so minor, why do it in the first place? Or was it a case of Australia&#x27;s emission regulations being so hopelessly behind the times that they were close to being in line at any rate? I can&#x27;t wait for the diesel engine to die altogether - and that includes heavy trucks.<p>1) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;au.volkswagen.com.au&#x2F;emission" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;au.volkswagen.com.au&#x2F;emission</a>
评论 #14285784 未加载
pdog大约 8 年前
Without getting into banal arguments about corporate personhood, there should be a &quot;death sentence&quot; for companies. Fines and regulations aren&#x27;t always enough to punish the most egregious corporate abuses.
评论 #14289979 未加载
coldcode大约 8 年前
I still wonder if&#x2F;how much the programmers knew about what they were writing. I&#x27;ve know a lot of programmers who never look beyond the story they are given to write, and those who are suspicious of everything.
评论 #14293494 未加载
评论 #14290112 未加载
cjCamel大约 8 年前
It&#x27;s a shame it&#x27;s not clear from the article why university students were testing emissions from a Jetta in the first place. Can anyone shed any light on this?
评论 #14284617 未加载
评论 #14293566 未加载
mxstbr大约 8 年前
They could not have shot less flattering photos of the students, holy moly.[0]<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;static01.nyt.com&#x2F;images&#x2F;2017&#x2F;05&#x2F;07&#x2F;business&#x2F;07VW-EWING-diptych&#x2F;07VW-EWING-diptych-master675-v3.jpg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;static01.nyt.com&#x2F;images&#x2F;2017&#x2F;05&#x2F;07&#x2F;business&#x2F;07VW-EWI...</a>
评论 #14285432 未加载