TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Trump Takes Aim at Western Monuments That May Hold Oil Riches

26 点作者 jtraffic大约 8 年前

3 条评论

nateberkopec大约 8 年前
I live very close to one of the National Monuments being discussed (Rio Grande Del Norte). It's a big tourist draw, not to mention it's wildlife and historical significance. Letting oil companies potentially put that in jeopardy to extract resources is really just a wealth transfer, putting the citizens at risk for the benefit of a few big oil companies.
评论 #14308418 未加载
orasis大约 8 年前
I'm sitting in my camper right now in the middle of Utah. Fuck these East coast pricks that have never even seen this land.
评论 #14308513 未加载
评论 #14311456 未加载
niftich大约 8 年前
Maps of the Bears Ears National Monument can be seen here [1][2], to give an idea as to what&#x27;s being talked about.<p>It includes the area between the current eastern boundary of Canyonlands NP &quot;below the rim&quot; of the mesas like Hatch Point Mesa and Harts Point Mesa.<p>In this 2014 article from Moab Sun News [3], it is mentioned that oil and gas surveys are being done in Harts Point (up on the mesa; outside of Bears Ears NM and not visible from &quot;below the rim&quot;); as well as in Lockhart Basin, the area sandwiched between the Mesa and Canyonlands (and thus protected by the new Bears Ears National Monument).<p>A quote from the article:<p><i>Walt Dabney, Moab resident, and retired superintendent of Canyonlands National Park (CNP), said that he is &quot;very concerned,&quot; about any possible development taking place below the rim in the Canyonlands Basin. While superintendent of CNP, he made a formal objection to the BLM, saying that there shouldn&#x27;t be any leases down in the basin because of the, &quot;certainty of compromising the national park qualities of Canyonlands National Park.&quot;<p>&quot;When you stand on the rim, there is an assumption by anyone who looks into that basin, that they are looking into the park. &quot;What they are really looking at is an illogical, political compromise that resulted in protecting only a portion of the basin. Any development placed in there will significantly diminish the quality of the park.&quot;</i><p>On the map, this is the northwesternmost protrusion of Bears Ears NM; a relatively small area. It includes significant portions of land further south (beyond the southern boundary of Canyonlands NP), including the northern rim of Goosenecks, all of the Valley of the Gods, the Moki Dugway, the roads leading to Natural Bridges and Hite Crossing, all of the Dark Canyon Wilderness, half of the Abajo Mountains, and the like, forming a continuous protected area from the existing patchwork of protected land and adjacent BLM-or-private land that looks visually identical yet hasn&#x27;t enjoyed the same protections. And remarkably, it does so in a way to protect viewsheds.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.grandcanyontrust.org&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;maps&#x2F;resources&#x2F;uw_BearsEars_Proclamation_8.5x11.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.grandcanyontrust.org&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;maps&#x2F;res...</a> [2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;upload.wikimedia.org&#x2F;wikipedia&#x2F;commons&#x2F;a&#x2F;a6&#x2F;Bears-ears-map.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;upload.wikimedia.org&#x2F;wikipedia&#x2F;commons&#x2F;a&#x2F;a6&#x2F;Bears-ea...</a> [3] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.moabsunnews.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;article_7b85d6f0-3e77-11e4-aac7-001a4bcf6878.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.moabsunnews.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;article_7b85d6f0-3e77-11e4-a...</a>