TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Any decentralization projects compatible with the current web?

1 点作者 johnnydoebk大约 8 年前
E.g. everyone is reinventing domain names. Namecoin has .bit, Ethereum has .eth. Both require installation of a special software on the client computer (or in case of Namecoin that can be the usage of a specific third party DNS). That means that a lot of potential users are lost; every device has a browser, not the blockchain software though. Has anyone tried to register {TLD}.{ccTLD} and then offer it as a second level domain instead of the new .{TLD}? As an example, .et.gl (&quot;Ethereum Global&quot;) is available at the moment. The advantage of this approach is that the domain (some mywebsite.et.gl) would resolve on any device using the standard DNS. And if the client is installed locally we can use a blockchain or whatever instead to resolve it.<p>The client blockhain app then can have a web interface available at client.et.gl that would be a local (127.0.0.1) service if you&#x27;ve installed it. Or a centralized hosted multiuser system otherwise (yeah, users who don&#x27;t care about decentralization will have to trust it).<p>In other words, there are a lot of people who build their own walled gardens of reinvented wheels. Is anyone working on a decentralization project with compatibility with the current web (read: usability) in mind?

暂无评论

暂无评论