Here in Vancouver, Canada, the main telco (Telus) started a fibre to the home build out throughout a number of cities and suburbs.
They are offering 150mbps symmetrical fibre for $47/mo (less for the first 3 months), and greater savings if you bundle with TV (which includes 4K).
The main cable company (Shaw) had to up their offering, and now have a 150mbps down/15mbps up for around the same price. Both carriers require multi year contracts.
In some areas of the city that have lots of new high density development, there are some smaller players that are offering faster fibre to the suite options.
Novus offers gig up and 100mbps down for $96. They also have other lower cost plans, as well as monthly add on fees for symmetrical transfer and unlimited data.
Another player, Urban Fibre, offers symmetrical gigabit for $79/mo (when they first launched it was $49/mo).<p>I wonder about how strong the consumer demand for gigabit internet actually is. If you're reading this, you probably have it or want it if you don't, but if you're the average person looking for a place to live (rent or own), how much will available internet speed be a factor (compared to location, cost, and other considerations like schools, fire stations, nightlife, commuting distances, access to public transit, and so on)?
A family of 4 can all stream different HD content on Netflix with a 25mbps connection. Not many homes would have multiple 4K/UHD displays, so would likely be ok with 50-60mbps.
What else are people needing all this bandwidth right now?