TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Xobni Goes Back In Time With Boxed Software

22 点作者 latif将近 15 年前

4 条评论

patio11将近 15 年前
I would be amazed if this works out well, but I wish them the best.<p>My guess is that customers may <i>say</i> they are more likely to purchase software online if they see it offline first, but very few actually <i>do</i> that. "Sure, that sounds like reasonable behavior, and I'm a reasonable person." You'll also get people to say things in surveys like "Yeah, I read privacy policies before signing up to websites". A full 78% of the population told the BBB they actively read those things, and 26% said they read every word. Those results should provoke <i>gales of laughter</i> from anyone here who actually checks their stats.<p>While the type of person who shops for software offline might pay more for it relative to an early adopting twenty-something who would prefer to pirate it anyhow, they do not pay so much more that it covers the retail markup.<p>Plus, selling software offline robs you of all the numerous ways you can play the retail game yourself, such as offering discounts, seasonal promotions, upsells. Not to mention opportunities to use analytics / email / etc etc.
评论 #1438122 未加载
ajg1977将近 15 年前
I think it's smart.<p>If your product is a compliment to another then sharing a point of sale is your earliest and best opportunity to make a sale. The type of people buying software at these stores, as opposed to Amazon/newegg etc, are generally the type least likely to discover/try/buy software such as Xobni online.<p>Also, Xobni Plus is a subscription product, so even if they make less on boxed sales it can lead to additional revenue in the future.
robryan将近 15 年前
Even better if they can get the customer service people suggesting it to people who are buying office, like how they always try to sell hdmi cables with tv's.
thunk将近 15 年前
Now <i>that's</i> thinking outside the ... oh, wait.