TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Search vs. Social: viral is the new SEO

11 点作者 jaf12duke将近 15 年前

3 条评论

MicahWedemeyer将近 15 年前
SEO is not dead, social media is not a replacement. Ignore SEO to your own detriment.<p>Real life example: My startup, DoLeaf (<a href="http://doleaf.com" rel="nofollow">http://doleaf.com</a>). We get the majority of our sales via SEO/Google. All we had to do to get there was to make sure to follow basic SEO guidelines (title tag, h1's, etc.)<p>People find us by searching on Google for very specific plants. They see a result that says "Buy XXX on DoLeaf". Click result, click checkout, done. Google sends high quality, high conversion traffic. Once we set it up, it required no further work on our part. Day and night, Google is sending us sales.<p>Contrast that to social media. Do we entice people to tweet about our plants? Add them to their Facebook profile? What? And how to do it? Successfully spinning up a viral loop is difficult to do and difficult to track. Finally, social media mentions grow stale pretty quick, so you've got to constantly feed that machine somehow to stay relevant.<p>We're not planning on ignoring social media, but you definitely should not ignore SEO. It hasn't been replaced by social media, just augmented. A different tool, a different purpose.
评论 #1440055 未加载
Julianhearn将近 15 年前
Facebook driving more traffic than google, no chance.<p>This article is pure linkbait.<p>If you think you survive without google traffic just block google bot in your robots.txt
iamdave将近 15 年前
Making a campaign and calling it "viral" doesn't make it so.