TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ghost trades

1 点作者 iliazin将近 8 年前
Does anyone care to actually get ownership of securities when executing a trade?<p>My understanding is that when you &#x27;invest&#x27; in the stock market (long term play, to minimise risk, counteract inflation, etc.), you really do care to get ownership of the actual security you paid for. However, when you &#x27;trade&#x27; on the stock market, expecting to sell off the security soon after buying it (likely within the same day), you do not really care to own it as such and that the &#x27;security&#x27; might as well be just an entry in a database which grants you the right to &#x27;sell&#x27; it again sometime in the future (hopefully getting back more that you initially paid for it).

1 comment

awinter-py将近 8 年前
I don&#x27;t think there&#x27;s a relevant distinction between a database entry and ownership of the company.<p>If the stock wasn&#x27;t a guarantee of equity rights, the information that drives the market wouldn&#x27;t have any financial meaning.<p>You can argue that market microstructure on a small enough scale isn&#x27;t related to fundamental value. Ok, maybe, but one of the reasons market microstructure exists is that the exchanges nominate certain entities to be market makers in order to ensure liquidity in the ticker symbol.<p>I think you&#x27;ll find that most phenomena in stock trading are related in some way to information about the stock&#x27;s fundamentals. (Even if it&#x27;s just sharks taking the other side of elephants).