TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Is Google far too much in love with engineering?

30 点作者 kadhinn将近 15 年前

8 条评论

sprout将近 15 年前
&#62;However, I wonder whether such slight, but no doubt data-driven, infelicities, such as the launch of Google Buzz, the riotously misguided home page designs, or the launch of Nexus One, might have done with one or two fewer data-driven managers and one or two more people who offered suggestions about what real people like and how they might react?<p>It's very easy to look at a company like Google and find examples of significant failures.<p>Though actually, I think the 'failures' he brings up are not quite the failures he thinks they are. They're not actually data-driven decisions. They're data-collecting experiments. Google is in no way wedded to any given device or approach. It's pivot, pivot, pivot, often in eight directions at once. Releasing a polished product with top-notch marketing is a good way to make a lot of money in the short term, but your customers get very attached to what you've given them, and it makes it a lot harder to innovate in the long term.
kwantam将近 15 年前
The author of this article backs up his argument with little substance. No decision-making process is perfect; pointing out the warts in Google's isn't much of an indictment. Really, to my mind the whole thing comes across as a bit whiny.
评论 #1449403 未加载
评论 #1449615 未加载
评论 #1449392 未加载
评论 #1449769 未加载
fliph将近 15 年前
Yeah, Google could be pretty successful if only they didn't focus so much on engineering.
评论 #1449838 未加载
shod将近 15 年前
&#62; Do complex interview questions really test your educational achievement? ...<p>When interviewing prospective software engineer employees, a Google interviewer asks software engineering related questions, to test the interviewee's knowledge of software engineering. Questions like these:<p><a href="http://jpaint.drizzlehosting.com/google.html" rel="nofollow">http://jpaint.drizzlehosting.com/google.html</a><p>That's a nice illustration of the balance of creativity, lateral thinking, logical thinking, and technical competence Google expects from the engineers it interviews. Note that the interview questions aren't in the form of, "Where did you complete your expected MSc in Computer Science?" Instead, the interviewee is expected to demonstrate real achievement from their education; i.e., knowledge and thinking ability.<p>But Google hires non-engineer craftsmen, too. Catering staff, to steal the article author's example. Just a hunch: Google conducts more than one type of interview: catering staff are not expected to design class libraries or database tables as part of their interview process.
SkyMarshal将近 15 年前
<i>This is how Dodge explained it: "The engineering background brings a rigorous thought process that questions assumptions and requires accurate data in the decision process. That doesn't mean every decision will be perfect, but it will be based on data...not opinions."</i><p>I think that strategy is unimpeachable. I've worked at plenty of non-engineering companies, and the inability to question assumptions seems rampant. If Google manages to avoid that, then whatever it costs will likely be worth it.
kiba将近 15 年前
What's wrong with the Nexus One launch?
评论 #1449180 未加载
评论 #1449260 未加载
dusklight将近 15 年前
I think it's funny this article showed up on the front page at the same time as another article about the Dunning-Krueger effect.
stcredzero将近 15 年前
The question should be: Is cluelessness in "soft skills" worse than technical cluelessness? Really, both are bad. (Example: Cuil)
评论 #1449269 未加载