TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

1950s U.S. Nuclear Target List Offers Chilling Insight (2015)

32 点作者 monort将近 8 年前

5 条评论

Amorymeltzer将近 8 年前
The article mentions Alex Wellerstein, who I cannot recommend highly enough for anyone interested in nuclear weapons. He runs the Restricted Data blog,[1] which is <i>excellent</i> and well worth the hours of reading you can spend there. He&#x27;s probably most famous for NUKEMAP.[2]<p>1: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.nuclearsecrecy.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.nuclearsecrecy.com&#x2F;</a><p>2: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;nuclearsecrecy.com&#x2F;nukemap&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;nuclearsecrecy.com&#x2F;nukemap&#x2F;</a><p>Two of his more recent pieces, are particularly worthwhile:<p>Brief history of the nuclear triad: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.nuclearsecrecy.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;07&#x2F;15&#x2F;brief-history-nuclear-triad&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.nuclearsecrecy.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;07&#x2F;15&#x2F;brief-history-nucl...</a><p>The President and the bomb: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.nuclearsecrecy.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;11&#x2F;18&#x2F;the-president-and-the-bomb&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.nuclearsecrecy.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;11&#x2F;18&#x2F;the-president-and-...</a>
jwtadvice将近 8 年前
The US continues, today, to be the only first-strike nuclear nation threatening to (as an explicit policy) destroy civilian population centers in a host of competitor countries as a coercive tactic and if and when it serves US national interest.<p>The further continuation of this longstanding policy, which is in effect today, is a matter of debate - though there has not yet been a strong enough coalition of opinion to withdraw this doctrine.<p>There were several nuclear strike target lists leaked from the past several administrations and they all say the same thing: capitols and population centers of compeditors, strike first in scenarios where not striking could put the US at a serious competitive disadvantage, use the threat of a strike and the deterrent of weapons of mass destruction as a coercive measure in the toolbox of statecraft.
评论 #14510315 未加载
评论 #14509954 未加载
评论 #14510383 未加载
评论 #14510025 未加载
评论 #14510075 未加载
评论 #14510984 未加载
desdiv将近 8 年前
&gt;It lists many targets for “systematic destruction” in major cities, including 179 in Moscow, 145 in Leningrad and 91 in East Berlin.<p>I wonder how many members of the Berlin Brigade[0] were aware that East Berlin was a major nuke target.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Berlin_Brigade" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Berlin_Brigade</a>
评论 #14510243 未加载
zkms将近 8 年前
The fictional book in the <i>Dr. Strangelove</i> film called &quot;World Targets in Megadeaths&quot; was no joke, it seems!
cnnsucks将近 8 年前
Good thing MAD worked.