TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Chinese scientists test quantum entanglement over unprecedented distance

138 点作者 javascript-this将近 8 年前

10 条评论

sliken将近 8 年前
A staple of sci-fi has been a pair of boxes with quantum entangled particles inside allowing FTL communications once the boxes travel (sub-FTL) to their destination.<p>By my understanding that&#x27;s impossible, although I always wondered if you could coordinate FTL, by detecting when a particle was no longer entangled.<p>Can someone with the background comment?
评论 #14567159 未加载
评论 #14567764 未加载
评论 #14567990 未加载
评论 #14569399 未加载
评论 #14567076 未加载
评论 #14567100 未加载
评论 #14571104 未加载
Illniyar将近 8 年前
I thought quantum entanglement is the idea that two quantum particles separated by distance will behave the same at the same time regardless od distance.<p>Why is sending photons over distances a verification of quantum entanglement?<p>Can someone elaborate on what this is?
评论 #14568041 未加载
评论 #14569507 未加载
评论 #14567037 未加载
评论 #14567021 未加载
评论 #14567789 未加载
EGreg将近 8 年前
Wikipedia says:<p>&quot;<i>If Bohmian Mechanics as an non-local hidden variables interpretation of quantum mechanics is accurate it should allow quantum computers to implement a search of an N-item database at most in O ( N 3 ) {\displaystyle O({\sqrt[{3}]{N}})} steps. This is slightly faster than the O ( N ) O({\sqrt {N}}) steps taken by Grover&#x27;s algorithm using standard interpretations of quantum mechanics. Neither search method will allow quantum computers to solve NP-Complete problems in polynomial time.[4]</i>&quot;<p>I thought there was no way to figure out which interpretation of QM is correct. Can someone explain?
评论 #14569513 未加载
评论 #14567982 未加载
kiliankoe将近 8 年前
As a child I dreamt of having two futuristic walkie-talkies sharing several pairs of entangled particles making perfect instant communication across the galaxy possible. Later my physics teacher crushed my dreams by telling me it&#x27;s far from as easy as that and probably impossible due to Heisenberg&#x27;s ... (no clue what it&#x27;s called in English). It&#x27;s pretty awesome to hear that something <i>similar</i> is actively being worked on and seems possible, although being a huge challenge.
评论 #14567133 未加载
评论 #14567191 未加载
评论 #14567109 未加载
ozy将近 8 年前
Note that while particles can be entangled, the special&#x2F;useful thing is the postponement of further entanglement (with the rest of the world).
评论 #14571132 未加载
pulse7将近 8 年前
The interesting part of &quot;quantum communications&quot; is the impact on security and surveillance. Does &quot;quantum communications&quot; even needs switches and routers? Backdoors don&#x27;t seem to be possible...
评论 #14567640 未加载
评论 #14567102 未加载
dynofuz将近 8 年前
So if quantum entanglement does not enable FTL communication, what is it good for? How do you keep getting entangled particles from one place to another?
fsiefken将近 8 年前
Could you use this for untraceable communication with hidden non-traceable submerged subs? That would be a military advantage.
评论 #14568021 未加载
评论 #14567685 未加载
评论 #14569290 未加载
chibaozi将近 8 年前
we can use quantum tech to break the GFW firewall
splicer将近 8 年前
Imagine being able to explore distant planets with robots and VR googles <i>in real time</i>!
评论 #14567156 未加载