> Many people also pointed to the concept of "fair use," which in certain circumstances lets content creators use other people's work for things like criticism, parody, or satire.<p>I'm impressed. Ever since Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music most people, including the press, seem to think that such uses are always fair use. This article got it right by saying "in certain circumstances".<p>In this case, though, I'm not sure that it matters because I'm not sure that Zillow has standing to sue for copyright infringement. To sue for copyright infringement, I believe you either have to be the copyright owner or you have to have an <i>exclusive</i> license. I'm pretty sure I've seen the same images Zillow uses on other real estate sites, suggesting that Zillow does not have an exclusive license.