I have a few questions.<p>1) “Facebook’s intrusion could have easily been blocked, but plaintiffs chose not to do so,”<p>This seems like a dangerous precedent. So if we can block surveillance attempts and we don't try, then it's our fault?<p>> “The fact that a user’s web browser automatically sends the same information to both parties does not establish that one party intercepted the user’s communication with the other,”<p>This makes no sense. Nothing happens "automatically", someone wrote the code for that to happen, in this case, Facebook.<p>But, at the end of the day it's just an embedded thing in a bunch of websites. I don't see anyone suing Google about AdSense. I mean I despise Facebook, but unless they're doing something more nefarious than getting a GET request on page load, then I'm not sure that I care enough. Get a blocker.