TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Future Pricing for Atlassian Cloud

71 点作者 torbica将近 8 年前

12 条评论

ec109685将近 8 年前
The slack model of only paying for active users is so much better than paying for users that may not actually be using the product:<p>How users are counted towards billing?<p>&quot;Once users are created they are automatically counted towards billing even if they don&#x27;t accept the invite or ever login. A user must be explicitly deactivated, deleted, or removed from a synced user directory (if you have Google sync) to not count towards billing. Learn how to add or remove users.&quot;<p>With slack, they are strongly incentivized to keep the product engaging enough to hold onto users.
评论 #14732909 未加载
评论 #14735690 未加载
strictnein将近 8 年前
&gt; &quot;Monthly pricing is progressive<p>Our monthly pricing is progressive, meaning that we offer volume discounts as you add more users&quot;<p>Just to nitpick: It&#x27;s actually regressive pricing. The larger your corporation, the less you&#x27;ll pay per user.
评论 #14732297 未加载
评论 #14732118 未加载
gressquel将近 8 年前
Its not huge price jump for everyone. Its just different pricing model. Companies pay per user instead of ranges like; 1-100 user, 100-500 user, 500-1000 user.<p>So with the old model if you had 101 user, you would pay the same price as someone with 499 users. Thats unfair.
评论 #14731882 未加载
shawkinaw将近 8 年前
Wow, the marginal cost of that 11th user is ridiculous ($67&#x2F;mo).
kogepathic将近 8 年前
I really wish they would extend per user licensing to their on premise version as well.<p>It&#x27;s completely stupid that if you are one user over the limit, you have to pay for the next block of licenses. It&#x27;s a huge cost increase for one more user.
评论 #14732925 未加载
pbreit将近 8 年前
Headline edited to &quot;huge price jump&quot; which seems inaccurate.
评论 #14732860 未加载
评论 #14732223 未加载
sofaofthedamned将近 8 年前
It actually looks like the way that they should have done the pricing originally. Not that i&#x27;m a fan of Atlassian as i&#x27;d rather use open-source alternatives, but this seems fairer.<p>Am I wrong?
smarx007将近 8 年前
The new pricing model does not actually seem like a &quot;huge pricing jump&quot;, but this makes me think for how long Trello will remain free...
评论 #14732193 未加载
评论 #14732053 未加载
bdcravens将近 8 年前
Not for small teams:<p>&gt; However, if you have 10 users or fewer, pricing will continue to be $10 for up to 10 users.
dstaheli将近 8 年前
Comparing, Microsoft Team Services pricing is based on team size, but the brackets are more granular. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.visualstudio.com&#x2F;team-services&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.visualstudio.com&#x2F;team-services&#x2F;</a>
budman1将近 8 年前
too expensive at any price.
nsp将近 8 年前
I