TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google not Amazon. Make fantastic savings in a server-less world

25 点作者 vgt将近 8 年前

7 条评论

aclsid将近 8 年前
Excuse me for being so stubborn, but this article reads like a paid for piece by Google. There is not enough information about who Andrew Walker is, and last time I checked, you needed to have some real professional help to create those kind of infographics.<p>Oh, and I have just checked, and I really hate when people do this without a disclaimer: &quot;3wks has been a Google Cloud Services Partner since 2012, building digital solutions for enterprise customers and public sector organisations specialising in web and mobile solutions on GCP.&quot;
评论 #14809361 未加载
评论 #14809493 未加载
评论 #14809397 未加载
评论 #14809344 未加载
评论 #14809354 未加载
评论 #14809371 未加载
评论 #14809723 未加载
toomuchtodo将近 8 年前
&gt; Why is IT ignoring Google’s server-less cloud infrastructure? They’re playing with their toys on Amazon and it’s costing tens of millions in missed business automation opportunities.<p>Because serverless at scale is phenomenally expensive compared to instances + ops. Solid for prototyping or where you just need to fire off some functions though.
评论 #14809330 未加载
评论 #14809349 未加载
brad0将近 8 年前
I&#x27;d love to see this backed up with actual cost comparison breakdown on google vs Amazon.<p>Also, I&#x27;m not sure the article 100% clarifies what it means by serverless. Does it mean &quot;functions as a service&quot;, or something else? The term serverless is overloaded these days.
评论 #14811738 未加载
sheeshkebab将近 8 年前
Aws has plenty of serverless - s3,dynamo,cloudfront,lamda,sqs, I could say rds and beanstalk are also kind of serverless, in loose way.<p>And aws is cheap...until it becomes not cheap (usually after you hit some numbers, or start dealing with &quot;compliance&quot;).<p>On google side, Gcp app engine is kinda bleh... kubernetes is probably the best thing they have, but it&#x27;s useful up to a point. And once you cross the &quot;point&quot; you start spending shit tons of money - and unless you are snapchat&#x2F;YouTube it&#x27;s hard to swallow it too.<p>Bottom line - aws might be marginally more expensive at first, but it has plenty of ways to keep things cheap if you are so inclined and flexible enough to meet all kinds of it needs (at a price of course).
yellowapple将近 8 年前
I stopped reading at the first subheader, since it immediately betrayed the author&#x27;s own ignorance regarding AWS&#x27; support for both automation and &quot;serverless&quot; software. Lambda is by no means obscure, nor is CloudFormation.<p>Calling one&#x27;s target audience &quot;ignorant&quot; does not make for a good argument, while we&#x27;re at it.
Mizza将近 8 年前
Surely, this person works for Google. Anybody who has actually dealt with any of this stuff in production knows that Amazon is the industry leader for a reason and that Google is way, way back in third place.<p>As with all things: you get what you pay for.
评论 #14809388 未加载
gkanapathy将近 8 年前
There is a deeper level of vendor lock-in for serverless vs servers as well.