TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Buried tools and pigments tell a history of humans in Australia for 65,000 years

91 点作者 iamjeff将近 8 年前

6 条评论

dalbasal将近 8 年前
<i>“It puts to bed the whole idea that humans wiped them (megafauna) out,” said Dr. Clarkson. “We’re talking 20,000 to 25,000 years of coexistence.”</i><p>Does it? Is it not still possible that human populations increased, new (less mgafauna friendly) cultures emerged or subsequent migrations caused one of these? Humans co-existed with large animals in many places, before causing extinctions at later points.
评论 #14818993 未加载
评论 #14820102 未加载
评论 #14821352 未加载
peatmoss将近 8 年前
I&#x27;ll note that one of the co-authors, Ben Marwick, has been very active in elevating reproducible computing practices in research. My understanding is that there&#x27;s code and data available for this research.<p>Also, here&#x27;s a short bit about reproducibility from Marwick that is worth a read for anyone in academia: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;theconversation.com&#x2F;how-computers-broke-science-and-what-we-can-do-to-fix-it-49938" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;theconversation.com&#x2F;how-computers-broke-science-and-w...</a>
评论 #14818581 未加载
评论 #14818531 未加载
teilo将近 8 年前
Well, this will certainly bolster the &quot;Out of Australia&quot; theorists.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;abcnews.go.com&#x2F;Technology&#x2F;story?id=99257" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;abcnews.go.com&#x2F;Technology&#x2F;story?id=99257</a>
sohkamyung将近 8 年前
I prefer the version published in The Conversation [1] by the researches themselves. It contains more details including one part left out of the NYTimes version: that the work was done with the approval of the Aboriginal people who control the site:<p>&quot;To make new research possible, a landmark agreement was reached between the University of Queensland (and associated researchers) and the Gundjeihmi Aboriginal Corporation representing the Mirarr traditional owners of the site.<p>The agreement gave ultimate control over the excavation to the Mirarr senior custodians, with oversight of the excavation and curation of the material. The Mirarr were interested to support new research into the age of the site and to know more about the early evidence of technologies thought to be present there.&quot;<p>[1] [ <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;theconversation.com&#x2F;buried-tools-and-pigments-tell-a-new-history-of-humans-in-australia-for-65-000-years-81021" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;theconversation.com&#x2F;buried-tools-and-pigments-tell-a...</a> ]
评论 #14818813 未加载
grecy将近 8 年前
This is one of my favorite things about Australia, because science has absolutely no explanation for how humans arrived in Australia that long ago.<p>It massively predates any boats, and there are no boats in the history of the Aboriginals.<p>In fact nobody has even really bothered to try an explain it, because it&#x27;s way, way, way outside the story that everyone came out of Africa.
评论 #14818903 未加载
评论 #14818918 未加载
评论 #14819123 未加载
评论 #14819586 未加载
评论 #14819124 未加载
aaron695将近 8 年前
You don&#x27;t get published for confirming existing theory (Sad but true, to an extent)<p>So I&#x27;d bet against it.<p>The article itself links to another article that seems to have evidence contradicting it -<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;03&#x2F;08&#x2F;science&#x2F;aboriginal-australians-dna-origins-australia.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;03&#x2F;08&#x2F;science&#x2F;aboriginal-austra...</a><p>It&#x27;d be interesting to hear an expert opinion on it.
评论 #14818343 未加载
评论 #14818790 未加载
评论 #14818456 未加载