Thank Goodness Apple's iPhone Violated 'Net Neutrality' in 2007

The article &quot;Time, WSJ anti-net neutrality op-ed writers were paid by telecoms&quot; (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dailydot.com&#x2F;layer8&#x2F;anti-net-neutrality-op-eds-time-wall-street-journal&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dailydot.com&#x2F;layer8&#x2F;anti-net-neutrality-op-eds-t...</a>) notes Mr. Hazlett&#x27;s extensive consulting work for telecoms, the resume link in the article is broken, a copy can be found on the Wayback Machine (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20160316075517&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.law.gmu.edu&#x2F;assets&#x2F;files&#x2F;faculty&#x2F;cv&#x2F;hazlett" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20160316075517&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.law.gm...</a>), consulting work listed on page 12.

This has nothing to do with ‘Net Neutrality’; a hardware company bundling services the way the article describes may violate some principals that some people have argued for in some context, but it has nothing to do with net neutrality, which is about ISP discrimination between lawful content and applications the end user is trying to access or use on the network.

Correct me if I&#x27;m wrong, but this seems to have nothing to do with net neutrality.