TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Instagram daily use surpasses Snapchat

186 点作者 rahulshiv将近 8 年前

16 条评论

meathook将近 8 年前
What do people think about &quot;minutes per day&quot; as a metric for success?<p>I think it represents a fundamental misalignment of goals between users and the company. By this metric, the more of your waking life that can be taken, the better.
评论 #14919193 未加载
评论 #14916811 未加载
评论 #14916797 未加载
评论 #14917274 未加载
评论 #14916970 未加载
评论 #14916836 未加载
评论 #14916853 未加载
评论 #14920312 未加载
评论 #14918897 未加载
nv-vn将近 8 年前
The whole point of Snapchat is that it&#x27;s not about sitting down, taking a high quality photo, editing it, etc. It&#x27;s a messaging app meant for quick replies. You send someone something and they reply back. That&#x27;s fundamentally different from Instagram&#x27;s model of user interaction. It&#x27;s like comparing time spent in iMessage to time spent on YouTube: it doesn&#x27;t make sense.
评论 #14917518 未加载
评论 #14918310 未加载
评论 #14920392 未加载
评论 #14918309 未加载
hahahsnap将近 8 年前
Metrics exposed by instagram is a pure scam aka growth hacking by fb engineers as their comp is aligned towards that.<p>Snapchat: Stories are not autoplay. You touch and see the story you&#x27;re interested in and the view closes. You have to scroll and open another story.<p>Instagram: Stories are autoplay. You click once and it&#x27;s a slideshow. So you can assume metric here are orders of magnitude higher than what it should be.<p>Snapchat: Story introduced a new revenue source without affecting bottomline.<p>Instagram: Stories at the top of the app is a very bad user experience. If an users spends more time in story, he spends less time in scrolling instagram feed. (Nobody in Instagram wants to talk about that).<p>Snapchat: People post whenever they feel like posting. Instagram: People post when they feel something is of very high quality.<p>Snapchat: Doesn&#x27;t want to grow the number of users as it doesn&#x27;t matter to company&#x27;s revenue. FB makes 75-80% of revenue with just it&#x27;s 10-20% of users which snapchat already own.
评论 #14917139 未加载
评论 #14916865 未加载
评论 #14918519 未加载
评论 #14917366 未加载
klondike_将近 8 年前
This isn&#x27;t exactly surprising. Snapchat is a messaging application, and Instagram is a messaging and picture sharing platform. Obviously users would spend more time browsing images on Insagram than just shooting off some messages to friends in Snapchat.
评论 #14916669 未加载
kul将近 8 年前
FB are the best at creating and controlling the narrative. Since the start. They&#x27;ll push out numbers that always favor them.
评论 #14920323 未加载
NemesisOfNo将近 8 年前
My celebrity and personal Snapchat stories have started dwindling. My stories are about 1&#x2F;3-1&#x2F;4 of what they were six months ago.<p>When I post to Snapchat, I used to get several dozen views from friends. Now I&#x27;m lucky if I get ten.<p>Snapchat just needs to allow you find and add friends more easily. That&#x27;s what&#x27;s holding them back.
评论 #14917114 未加载
packetized将近 8 年前
I&#x27;ll be concerned about $SNAP when Instagram is used in lieu of texting.
评论 #14917304 未加载
Rjevski将近 8 年前
An app with a decent UX surpasses a shitty one with dreadful UX - who would&#x27;ve thought?
评论 #14918308 未加载
评论 #14918528 未加载
astrostl将近 8 年前
I really can&#x27;t get over how poor I find Snapchat&#x27;s UI&#x2F;UX to be, and I don&#x27;t _think_ it&#x27;s because I&#x27;m old. But I second-guess it.
评论 #14920098 未加载
评论 #14919350 未加载
评论 #14919829 未加载
Markoff将近 8 年前
i feel old (in 30s) when i have problem to distinguish these two services, do I remember correctly that Instagram is just some photo albums for food (not sure what&#x27;s difference from Google photos) and Snapchat is some chat with stickers for teenagers?<p>I don&#x27;t use Twitter, Facebook or pretty much any social media (besides Reddit and HN) and I don&#x27;t feel like i am missing on something.
yalogin将近 8 年前
At first glance I thought snap had more users than Instagram and that surprised me a lot. If it’s just the amount time users are using the app, I don’t know it should be that surprising if Instagram cloned snap’s feature. Unfortunately for Snap FB has a lot bigger pockets than them and so it’s unlikely they will ever relent.
visarga将近 8 年前
&gt; What happens, for example, if we recreate the structure of the brain on a computer by interacting silicon chips where you had interacting neurons? Would it be missing anything that’s missing in the mind? I’d like to think that a computer could be conscious. I don&#x27;t think consciousness is reducible to a pattern of interactions in the brain, but I do think that if one reproduces that pattern of interactions in fine enough detail, one will reproduce consciousness.<p>Perfectly said. Consciousness is not reducible to a pattern of interaction in the brain because it&#x27;s a system of brain+world that creates consciousness. The brain learns from the world first, only later it is capable of independent imagination and thinking. A brain never connected to the world would not be conscious. An AI connected to the world (or a simulation) could be conscious of the world it exists in, and of its own existence there.
eosophos将近 8 年前
I do not understand the hype about Snapchat... Doesn&#x27;t IG do everything and more?
评论 #14919706 未加载
tedmiston将近 8 年前
&gt; If Facebook’s goal was stop Snap in its tracks, it’s largely succeeded with Instagram Stories. Snapchat’s monthly active user growth rate has plummeted from 17.2% per quarter to just 5%...<p>Does HN think that these two events are even related?<p>From my experience, the content I get via Instagram Stories is mostly from people I don&#x27;t know but follow whereas Snapchat is still where most of the interactions with my friends happens. The products have similar features but the audience, especially being public-facing, is totally different in my experience.
loveass将近 8 年前
there&#x27;s more ass on instagram, that&#x27;s why. snapchat needs ass
sreejithr将近 8 年前
No shit, Sherlock!