TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Anyone want a CLI and push based Slack client (focused on battery life)?

5 点作者 busymichael将近 8 年前
Two days a week I work remotely, usually unplugged from a power source for most of the day. I have to run Skype and Slack to keep connected to the office. I find both clients are bloated and hog battery.<p>I was thinking about coding a command line based client that would use the Slack API&#x27;s to replicate Slack text chat functionality in a very minimal program.<p>I would use a cloud based server to poll Slack for new messages and then push them down to the client. This keeps the client from continually having to check for new messages -- and improves battery life for my laptop.<p>If it worked, I could add other chat channels.<p>One limitation: it would probably support text and image only -- not audio&#x2F;video<p>Is anyone else facing the same problems? Would you be interested in such a solution?<p>What would you want to see in it?<p>Thanks!

4 条评论

draven超过 7 年前
At work I use wee-slack ( <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;wee-slack&#x2F;wee-slack" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;wee-slack&#x2F;wee-slack</a> ) a plugin for weechat that uses the slack API (<i>not</i> the IRC gateway.) Images &#x2F; code snippets &#x2F; etc. were rendered as an HTTP link. It works pretty well, CPU and memory usage are low, unlike the web interface.
ErikRogneby将近 8 年前
If you turn off auto expanding gifs and images it saves a lot of your battery. I also wonder if the browser based client is any less of a hog?<p>To answer your question, if I&#x27;m on the CLI, I&#x27;m doing work. Slack helps with team cohesion but is a focus killer. I wouldn&#x27;t be interested.
评论 #14934607 未加载
deft将近 8 年前
Why not just use the IRC gateway? This seems like reinventing the wheel.
评论 #14930069 未加载
paulcole将近 8 年前
No thank you.