TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The New Copycats: How Facebook Squashes Competition From Startups

70 点作者 thinxer将近 8 年前

8 条评论

pelario将近 8 年前
Same article (without paywall) was submitted and discussed two days ago:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=14970877" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=14970877</a>
dave_sullivan将近 8 年前
In case anyone from WSJ or other paywalled content producers reads this: I notice myself sharing far less when I hit a paywall even if I used one of my &quot;free credits&quot; because hitting a paywall is shitty to the people clicking the shared link. If it&#x27;s important information, I will actually find a different source and share that.<p>So you shouldn&#x27;t worry about lost subscription revenue, you should worry about lost relevancy. Lost relevancy will result in your CPMs on ads being a Mashable rate, not a WSJ rate.<p>Publishers that do this will literally nickel and dime themselves out of relevancy. But whatever, I don&#x27;t read WSJ or the economist anymore because paywalls and they&#x27;re not the only (or even best) analysis online. Sad to see the mighty fall though.<p>Same deal with &quot;We noticed you running Adblock :-(...&quot; Most tech savvy people have Adblock. Many of them have many more followers who <i>do not</i> have Adblock, and those people get their links from social streams. So again, you&#x27;re not turning away adblockers, you&#x27;re turning away their friends and leaving the public consciousness.
RivieraKid将近 8 年前
Monitoring and copying potential threats at early stage is an obvious and effective strategy. This is the unpleasant thing about many startups, technology is a commodity, the big players can simply copy it (or buy it if they think it&#x27;s cheaper).<p>Honestly, I think it&#x27;s unfair. You can put effort into making an amazing though-out product with a lot of novel ideas behind it, but the big players can simply copy you and use their monopoly power (network effects, integration into existing product, marketing) to make a superior product.<p>The problem is that companies like Facebook or Google are monopolies which use their monopoly profits to further expand their imperiums. In a competitive market, profit margins around 30 % would be impossible, because a competitors would push the prices close to 0 % margin (btw, the &quot;real&quot; profit margin is much more than 30 %, because these companies put lot of resources into research, buying overpriced startups, and in general are not very efficient with money). This just sucks in my opinion...
readhn将近 8 年前
&quot;Mr. Zuckerberg is sensitive to anything that might disrupt Facebook, even the teeniest startup, say current and former executives and employees. &quot;<p>that says it all. Facebook is vulnerable and has a limited life span. The idea is out of the bag. It has a high chance of going away just like myspace and others before. Z. knows it and it seems will protect it at any cost.<p>When you suppress competition instead of reinventing yourself and retaining&#x2F;attracting users that way - you are basically done.
评论 #14989722 未加载
type-2将近 8 年前
read here if paywalled <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;LUAA8" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;LUAA8</a>
mrlatinos将近 8 年前
Paywall
juststeve将近 8 年前
surprisingly, i also got the paywall
beaconstudios将近 8 年前
can&#x27;t read it due to the paywall.